Shared postprandial gene expression signatures: a systematic review and quantitative data synthesis

  • Faezeh Abaj
  • , Gary Williamson*
  • , Aimee L. Dordevic
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Flexibility of response to a macronutrient challenge is a hallmark of metabolic health, but the postprandial response is complex and involves perturbation of multiple pathways at the gene expression, protein, and metabolite levels. This systematic review compared postprandial transcriptomic responses with fasting levels by combining raw data from 14 studies (13 datasets) that assessed at least two different meals. Strikingly, despite large differences in study designs and meal types, common shared postprandial gene expression responses were identified. At 2, 4, and 6 h after a meal, we identified 36, 711, and 12 genes common to at least three studies, respectively, with Gene Ontology (GO) analysis indicating perturbation of immune response at 2 h, cellular regulation, macroautophagy, phosphorus metabolism and stress response at 4 h and circadian regulation at 6 h. A multivariate integrative analysis (MINT.sPLS) did not identify significant effects of specific meal macronutrients on gene expression levels, indicating that some of the observed changes may represent a shared common transcriptomic signature of eating rather than a response to a specific nutrient. These findings will assist future studies to determine the flexibility of metabolic responses at the transcriptome level in, for example, individuals with metabolic syndrome, obesity, or insulin resistance.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages18
JournalCritical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
Early online date31 Oct 2025
DOIs
Publication statusEarly online date - 31 Oct 2025

Keywords

  • gene expression
  • meal composition
  • metabolic flexibility

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Shared postprandial gene expression signatures: a systematic review and quantitative data synthesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this