Abstract
John O’Neill argues in a recent article, ‘Should Communitarians be Nationalists?’, that communitarians are wrong to be committed to the defence of ties of nationhood, both because the nation-state’s rise is associated with the disappearance of the ties of community and because the nation is an illusory community. I argue that the evidence that communitarianism is committed as charged to the defence of nationality is unconvincing. Further, the familiar accusation that the nation is a false or unreal community is neither perspicuous nor obviously true. It is important to evaluate the significance and worth of the nation as a community independently of the nationalist prescription that the nation and the state should coincide. The important question is not whether the political community should be a nation, but what sort of community the nation should be.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 215-220 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Journal of Applied Philosophy |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 01 Aug 1996 |
Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy