Signs of dysconscious racism and xenophobiaism in knowledge production and the formation of academic researchers: a national study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
14 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The relation of social ethics to knowledge production is explored through a study about academic research enquiry on minoritised and racialised populations. Despite social change related to migration and ethnicity being a feature of contemporary Northern Ireland, local dynamics and actors seemed under-studied by its research-intensive ‘anchor universities’. To explore this, a critical discourse analysis of published research outputs (n=200) and related authors’ narratives (n=32) are interpreted within this paper through conceptualisations of consciousness. Insiders’ perspectives on the influences and structures of the research journey demonstrate the ways in which research cultures (mis)shape the politics of representation, authorship and ethicality. Societal and political disregard for the new publics, reproduced within universities’ hidden curriculum, was negotiated and to some extent resisted in the research practices of those marginalised (such as women academics), those entering the system (migrant academics), and those local-born whose referential frames were developed external to local universities. Of concern is that the few research enablers were characterised by techno-rationality and doublespeak, impoverishing the depth of theorisation, complexity and intellectual debate necessary for challenging the existing dysconscious racism and xenophobiaism of the social imaginary.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of Academic Ethics
Early online date13 Jul 2024
DOIs
Publication statusEarly online date - 13 Jul 2024

Keywords

  • consciousness
  • racism
  • xenophobia
  • Northern Ireland
  • Ireland
  • United Kingdom
  • research culture
  • research
  • social justice
  • migration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Signs of dysconscious racism and xenophobiaism in knowledge production and the formation of academic researchers: a national study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this