Social identity, groups, and post-traumatic stress disorder

Orla T. Muldoon*, Robert D. Lowe

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As with the identification and labelling of many mental health problems, the adoption of PTSD within DSM can be said to arise from contemporaneous social and political contexts: specifically the return to the United States of many war-affected veterans from Vietnam (Scott, 1993). The specific circumstances of the recognition of PTSD within DSM-III have led several commentators to discuss it in terms of social construction (e.g., Summerfield, 2001). The current review argues that the orientation of theory and research aimed at understanding PTSD has been particularly informed by Western individualistic constructions of social phenomena. Our review calls for a blending of approaches to understanding post-traumatic stress by considering the social structures and contexts in which it is expressed and in particular by considering how a group-level analysis can inform incidence, diagnosis, and expression of post-traumatic symptoms.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)259-273
Number of pages15
JournalPolitical Psychology
Volume33
Issue number2
Early online date27 Mar 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • groups
  • post-traumatic stress disorder
  • post-traumatic symptoms
  • social identity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Philosophy
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Social identity, groups, and post-traumatic stress disorder'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this