Abstract
Peacebuilding frameworks reflect an imperative to acknowledge the experiences of victims in an effort to remedy their harm and consolidate peace. Most social groups involved in conflict, however, claim to be the ‘real’ victims, often while refuting the victimhood of their adversaries. This exclusive attitude toward victims resonates with group identification and complicates the task of addressing victims’ needs. This article examines the implications of such exclusive, intergroup perceptions of victims on the prospect of peacebuilding,
drawing upon empirical evidence from Northern Ireland. Three overlapping implications emerge, including difficulty identifying victims and their needs, proliferation of a competitive and politicised ‘victim culture’ and the so-called ‘hierarchy of victims’. Exclusive, intergroup perceptions demonstrated in these three implications impede peacebuilding primarily by preventing the development of new, co-operative relationships between groups and reinforcing
divisive group identities.
drawing upon empirical evidence from Northern Ireland. Three overlapping implications emerge, including difficulty identifying victims and their needs, proliferation of a competitive and politicised ‘victim culture’ and the so-called ‘hierarchy of victims’. Exclusive, intergroup perceptions demonstrated in these three implications impede peacebuilding primarily by preventing the development of new, co-operative relationships between groups and reinforcing
divisive group identities.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 289-304 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Peacebuilding |
Volume | 5 |
Early online date | 29 Sept 2016 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Early online date - 29 Sept 2016 |
Keywords
- victims
- conflict
- intergroup relations
- identity
- Northern Ireland