Softening-up persistently stubborn institutional stances in net zero change environments

Nicola Barron*, Mark Palmer, Joseph Ireland, Chuan Li

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The decarbonization of the built environment remains a strategically important net zero pathway. Relative to other net zero pathways the built environment persistently lags behind. To address this problem, we use the theoretical lens of institutional stance to enrich the understanding of the cognitive-cultural foundations of institutions, in particular how entrusted institutional members hold, reflect and assert specific stances towards decarbonization of the built environment. In this institutional stance analysis, we identify three institutional change practices of nudging, tugging and mooring for softening-up persistently stubborn stances in the pursuit of net zero goals. The findings point to mooring mechanisms which permit institutional members to ‘step out’ via temporal institutional respites, and subsequently reconciling these stances through the practice of satisficing, technology cycling and contrasting. Finally, conclusions and practical implications are presented for softening-up persistently stubborn stances in prolongated net zero change environments.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages17
JournalStrategic Change
Early online date03 Dec 2024
DOIs
Publication statusEarly online date - 03 Dec 2024

Publications and Copyright Policy

This work is licensed under Queen’s Research Publications and Copyright Policy.

Keywords

  • institutional stances
  • institutions
  • decarbonization
  • built environment
  • net zero

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Softening-up persistently stubborn institutional stances in net zero change environments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this