Solar radiation modification: ethical perspectives

Nikola Biller-Andorno; Maria do Céu Patrão Neves; Migle Laukyte; Paweł Łuków; Pierre Mallia; Fruzsina Molnár-Gábor; Thérèse Murphy; Herman Nys; Laura Palazzani; Barbara Prainsack; Nils Eric Sahlin; Tamar Sharon; Jeroen van den Hoven; Renata Veselska; Takis Vidalis; European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies

doi:10.2777/951016

Solar radiation modification: ethical perspectives

Nikola Biller-Andorno
, Maria do Céu Patrão Neves
, Migle Laukyte
, Paweł Łuków
, Pierre Mallia
, Fruzsina Molnár-Gábor
, Thérèse Murphy
, Herman Nys
, Laura Palazzani
, Barbara Prainsack
, Nils Eric Sahlin
, Tamar Sharon
, Jeroen van den Hoven
, Renata Veselska
, Takis Vidalis
, European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies

School of Law

Research output: Book/Report › Commissioned report

310 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this Opinion, the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies (EGE) presents ethical perspectives on Solar Radiation Modification (SRM), a set of potential geoengineering techniques that could create a net cooling effect on the climate and thus help with addressing the triple planetary crisis. Little is known about how large scale deployment of SRM would play out and the risks it would incur are major and hard to predict.The EGE analyses knowledge gaps and uncertainties around SRM and maps societal and ethical concerns. It makes the case for values-based and sound participatory deliberation and decision-making in the context of a precautionary approach to SRM governance. It also calls for instituting a moratorium on large-scale SRM deployment and for research to be directed by the principle of social and environmental responsibility.

Original language	English
Publisher	Publications office of the European Union
Commissioning body	European Commission
Number of pages	61
ISBN (Print)	9789268201008
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.2777/951016
Publication status	Published - 09 Dec 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 13 Climate Action

Access to Document

10.2777/951016Licence: CC BY

Solar radiation modification: ethical perspectives
© European Union, 2024. This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the author and source are cited
Final published version, 1.37 MBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

Biller-Andorno, N., do Céu Patrão Neves, M., Laukyte, M., Łuków, P., Mallia, P., Molnár-Gábor, F., Murphy, T., Nys, H., Palazzani, L., Prainsack, B., Sahlin, N. E., Sharon, T., van den Hoven, J., Veselska, R., Vidalis, T., & European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies (2024). Solar radiation modification: ethical perspectives. Publications office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2777/951016

@book{1bdfd170da354fa880e1be84cf55f24d,

title = "Solar radiation modification: ethical perspectives",

abstract = "In this Opinion, the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies (EGE) presents ethical perspectives on Solar Radiation Modification (SRM), a set of potential geoengineering techniques that could create a net cooling effect on the climate and thus help with addressing the triple planetary crisis. Little is known about how large scale deployment of SRM would play out and the risks it would incur are major and hard to predict.The EGE analyses knowledge gaps and uncertainties around SRM and maps societal and ethical concerns. It makes the case for values-based and sound participatory deliberation and decision-making in the context of a precautionary approach to SRM governance. It also calls for instituting a moratorium on large-scale SRM deployment and for research to be directed by the principle of social and environmental responsibility.",

author = "Nikola Biller-Andorno and \{do C{\'e}u Patr{\~a}o Neves\}, Maria and Migle Laukyte and Pawe{\l} {\L}uk{\'o}w and Pierre Mallia and Fruzsina Moln{\'a}r-G{\'a}bor and Th{\'e}r{\`e}se Murphy and Herman Nys and Laura Palazzani and Barbara Prainsack and Sahlin, \{Nils Eric\} and Tamar Sharon and \{van den Hoven\}, Jeroen and Renata Veselska and Takis Vidalis and \{European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies\}",

year = "2024",

month = dec,

day = "9",

doi = "10.2777/951016",

language = "English",

isbn = "9789268201008",

publisher = "Publications office of the European Union",

}

Biller-Andorno, N, do Céu Patrão Neves, M, Laukyte, M, Łuków, P, Mallia, P, Molnár-Gábor, F, Murphy, T, Nys, H, Palazzani, L, Prainsack, B, Sahlin, NE, Sharon, T, van den Hoven, J, Veselska, R, Vidalis, T & European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies 2024, Solar radiation modification: ethical perspectives. Publications office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2777/951016

TY - BOOK

T1 - Solar radiation modification: ethical perspectives

AU - Biller-Andorno, Nikola

AU - do Céu Patrão Neves, Maria

AU - Laukyte, Migle

AU - Łuków, Paweł

AU - Mallia, Pierre

AU - Molnár-Gábor, Fruzsina

AU - Murphy, Thérèse

AU - Nys, Herman

AU - Palazzani, Laura

AU - Prainsack, Barbara

AU - Sahlin, Nils Eric

AU - Sharon, Tamar

AU - van den Hoven, Jeroen

AU - Veselska, Renata

AU - Vidalis, Takis

AU - European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies

PY - 2024/12/9

Y1 - 2024/12/9

N2 - In this Opinion, the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies (EGE) presents ethical perspectives on Solar Radiation Modification (SRM), a set of potential geoengineering techniques that could create a net cooling effect on the climate and thus help with addressing the triple planetary crisis. Little is known about how large scale deployment of SRM would play out and the risks it would incur are major and hard to predict.The EGE analyses knowledge gaps and uncertainties around SRM and maps societal and ethical concerns. It makes the case for values-based and sound participatory deliberation and decision-making in the context of a precautionary approach to SRM governance. It also calls for instituting a moratorium on large-scale SRM deployment and for research to be directed by the principle of social and environmental responsibility.

AB - In this Opinion, the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies (EGE) presents ethical perspectives on Solar Radiation Modification (SRM), a set of potential geoengineering techniques that could create a net cooling effect on the climate and thus help with addressing the triple planetary crisis. Little is known about how large scale deployment of SRM would play out and the risks it would incur are major and hard to predict.The EGE analyses knowledge gaps and uncertainties around SRM and maps societal and ethical concerns. It makes the case for values-based and sound participatory deliberation and decision-making in the context of a precautionary approach to SRM governance. It also calls for instituting a moratorium on large-scale SRM deployment and for research to be directed by the principle of social and environmental responsibility.

U2 - 10.2777/951016

DO - 10.2777/951016

M3 - Commissioned report

SN - 9789268201008

BT - Solar radiation modification: ethical perspectives

PB - Publications office of the European Union

ER -

Solar radiation modification: ethical perspectives

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this