Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Sows in mid parity are best foster mothers for the pre- A nd post-weaning performance of both light and heavy piglets

  • Anne M.S. Huting*
  • , Panagiotis Sakkas
  • , Ilias Kyriazakis
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

To improve the performance of lightweight piglets during suckling, producers are advised to create uniform litters using young sows. However, fostering piglets to primiparous sows may confer penalties due to their lower milk yield and milk immunoglobulin concentrations compared with multiparous sows. The objective was to determine the effect of foster sow parity (primiparous (F), second (S), and mid parity (M: Parity 3 to 5)) on the performance from birth to day 68 of piglets born light (L: ≤1.25 kg) or heavy (H: 1.50-2.00 kg) and on creep feed consumption. Piglets (n = 507) considered L or H were cross-fostered, creating litters of 13 similar-sized piglets/litter and were randomly fostered to one of the foster parities. All litters were offered creep feed with a green dye to discern between consumers and nonconsumers, and the medication administered was recorded. Medication administrated pre- A nd postweaning did not differ (P > 0.05) across the different experimental groups. A significantly (P ≤ 0.025) lower number of H piglets were removed as a result of preweaning weight loss from F and S, rather than M litters. The interaction between birth weight and foster parity only affected piglet BW at day 10 (P = 0.020); foster parity did not influence BW of L piglets, but influenced that of H piglets. H piglets in F and M litters (3.82 and 3.80 kg) were significantly lighter (P ≤ 0.013) than H piglets in S litters (4.15 kg). As expected, L piglets performed worse pre- A nd postweaning than H piglets; they were 4.50 kg lighter at day 68. Foster parity significantly affected BW: F piglets were weaned lighter (P = 0.004) than S and M piglets (7.52 vs. 8.02 kg). Postweaning (day 68) however, F piglets achieved similar BW as S piglets (29.7 vs. 29.9 kg), whereas M piglets performed best (31.2 kg, P ≤ 0.079). Significantly fewer (almost none) of the L than the H piglets consumed creep feed (P < 0.001); significantly (P = 0.007) more F and M piglets were considered consumers than S piglets. The results suggest that irrespectively of birth weight, piglets tend to perform better when in M litters, being weaned heavy and having a high creep feed intake; however, more piglets are removed from such litters preweaning. Although S litters were weaned heavy, they were unable to maintain this BW advantage postweaning, due to their low creep feed intake and F litters remained small throughout. Long-term performance monitoring to slaughter is recommended.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1656-1670
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Animal Science
Volume97
Issue number4
Early online date11 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 03 Apr 2019
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This project was sponsored by AHDB (Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board) Pork and Primary Diets.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • creep feed
  • lightweight piglets
  • pigs
  • sow parity
  • teat position
  • weaning weight

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Genetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sows in mid parity are best foster mothers for the pre- A nd post-weaning performance of both light and heavy piglets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this