State power matters: power, the state and political struggle in the post-war American novel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article is concerned with resituating the state at the centre of the analytical stage and, concomitantly, with drawing attention to the dangers of losing sight of the state as a locus of power. It seeks to uncover the relationship between two related lines of critical inquiry: Marxist and Foucauldian theories of the state; and the attempts by three postwar American novelist (Ken Kesey, William Burroughs and E.L. Doctorow) to determine the nature and extent of this power and to consider under what conditions political struggle might be possible. It argues that such a move is needed because recent critical analysis has been too preoccupied by corporeal micropolitics and global macropolitics, and that the postwar American novel can help us in this move because it is centrally concerned with the repressive potentiality of the US state. It maintains that the resuscitation of Marxist state theories in early 1970s and a debate between Poulantzas and Foucault is intriguingly foreshadowed and even critiqued by these novels. Consequently, it concludes that these novels constitute an unrecognized pre-history of what would become one of the key intellectual debates of the late twentieth century: an engagement between Marxist and post-structuralist conceptions of the power and resistance.
LanguageEnglish
Pages467-491
Number of pages25
JournalTextual Practice
Volume19(4)
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2005

Fingerprint

American Novels
State Power
Novel
Potentiality
1970s
William S. Burroughs
Poulantzas
Critical Analysis
Prehistory
Danger
Locus
Structuralist
State Theory
American Novelist
Micropolitics
Conception

Cite this

@article{526d2e6f057147468c88daa1465aa75a,
title = "State power matters: power, the state and political struggle in the post-war American novel",
abstract = "This article is concerned with resituating the state at the centre of the analytical stage and, concomitantly, with drawing attention to the dangers of losing sight of the state as a locus of power. It seeks to uncover the relationship between two related lines of critical inquiry: Marxist and Foucauldian theories of the state; and the attempts by three postwar American novelist (Ken Kesey, William Burroughs and E.L. Doctorow) to determine the nature and extent of this power and to consider under what conditions political struggle might be possible. It argues that such a move is needed because recent critical analysis has been too preoccupied by corporeal micropolitics and global macropolitics, and that the postwar American novel can help us in this move because it is centrally concerned with the repressive potentiality of the US state. It maintains that the resuscitation of Marxist state theories in early 1970s and a debate between Poulantzas and Foucault is intriguingly foreshadowed and even critiqued by these novels. Consequently, it concludes that these novels constitute an unrecognized pre-history of what would become one of the key intellectual debates of the late twentieth century: an engagement between Marxist and post-structuralist conceptions of the power and resistance.",
author = "Andrew Pepper",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1080/09502360500329760",
language = "English",
volume = "19(4)",
pages = "467--491",
journal = "Textual Practice",
issn = "0950-236X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

State power matters: power, the state and political struggle in the post-war American novel. / Pepper, Andrew.

In: Textual Practice, Vol. 19(4), No. 4, 12.2005, p. 467-491.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - State power matters: power, the state and political struggle in the post-war American novel

AU - Pepper, Andrew

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - This article is concerned with resituating the state at the centre of the analytical stage and, concomitantly, with drawing attention to the dangers of losing sight of the state as a locus of power. It seeks to uncover the relationship between two related lines of critical inquiry: Marxist and Foucauldian theories of the state; and the attempts by three postwar American novelist (Ken Kesey, William Burroughs and E.L. Doctorow) to determine the nature and extent of this power and to consider under what conditions political struggle might be possible. It argues that such a move is needed because recent critical analysis has been too preoccupied by corporeal micropolitics and global macropolitics, and that the postwar American novel can help us in this move because it is centrally concerned with the repressive potentiality of the US state. It maintains that the resuscitation of Marxist state theories in early 1970s and a debate between Poulantzas and Foucault is intriguingly foreshadowed and even critiqued by these novels. Consequently, it concludes that these novels constitute an unrecognized pre-history of what would become one of the key intellectual debates of the late twentieth century: an engagement between Marxist and post-structuralist conceptions of the power and resistance.

AB - This article is concerned with resituating the state at the centre of the analytical stage and, concomitantly, with drawing attention to the dangers of losing sight of the state as a locus of power. It seeks to uncover the relationship between two related lines of critical inquiry: Marxist and Foucauldian theories of the state; and the attempts by three postwar American novelist (Ken Kesey, William Burroughs and E.L. Doctorow) to determine the nature and extent of this power and to consider under what conditions political struggle might be possible. It argues that such a move is needed because recent critical analysis has been too preoccupied by corporeal micropolitics and global macropolitics, and that the postwar American novel can help us in this move because it is centrally concerned with the repressive potentiality of the US state. It maintains that the resuscitation of Marxist state theories in early 1970s and a debate between Poulantzas and Foucault is intriguingly foreshadowed and even critiqued by these novels. Consequently, it concludes that these novels constitute an unrecognized pre-history of what would become one of the key intellectual debates of the late twentieth century: an engagement between Marxist and post-structuralist conceptions of the power and resistance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34347303461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09502360500329760

DO - 10.1080/09502360500329760

M3 - Article

VL - 19(4)

SP - 467

EP - 491

JO - Textual Practice

T2 - Textual Practice

JF - Textual Practice

SN - 0950-236X

IS - 4

ER -