Stated choices and benefit estimates in the context of traffic calming schemes: Utility maximization, regret minimization, or both?

Marco Boeri, Riccardo Scarpa, Caspar G. Chorus

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    21 Citations (Scopus)
    141 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This paper proposes a discrete mixture model which assigns individuals, up to a probability, to either a class of random utility (RU) maximizers or a class of random regret (RR) minimizers, on the basis of their sequence of observed choices. Our proposed model advances the state of the art of RU-RR mixture models by (i) adding and simultaneously estimating a membership model which predicts the probability of belonging to a RU or RR class; (ii) adding a layer of random taste heterogeneity within each behavioural class; and (iii) deriving a welfare measure associated with the RU-RR mixture model and consistent with referendum-voting, which is the adequate mechanism of provision for such local public goods. The context of our empirical application is a stated choice experiment concerning traffic calming schemes. We find that the random parameter RU-RR mixture model not only outperforms its fixed coefficient counterpart in terms of fit-as expected-but also in terms of plausibility of membership determinants of behavioural class. In line with psychological theories of regret, we find that, compared to respondents who are familiar with the choice context (i.e. the traffic calming scheme), unfamiliar respondents are more likely to be regret minimizers than utility maximizers.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)121-135
    Number of pages15
    JournalTransportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
    Volume61
    Early online date04 Feb 2014
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014

    Fingerprint

    traffic calming
    psychological theory
    local public
    referendum
    voting
    Utility maximization
    Stated choice
    welfare
    determinants
    Random utility
    experiment
    Mixture model

    Cite this

    @article{b1e71d044de34943a156582d18d75fc0,
    title = "Stated choices and benefit estimates in the context of traffic calming schemes: Utility maximization, regret minimization, or both?",
    abstract = "This paper proposes a discrete mixture model which assigns individuals, up to a probability, to either a class of random utility (RU) maximizers or a class of random regret (RR) minimizers, on the basis of their sequence of observed choices. Our proposed model advances the state of the art of RU-RR mixture models by (i) adding and simultaneously estimating a membership model which predicts the probability of belonging to a RU or RR class; (ii) adding a layer of random taste heterogeneity within each behavioural class; and (iii) deriving a welfare measure associated with the RU-RR mixture model and consistent with referendum-voting, which is the adequate mechanism of provision for such local public goods. The context of our empirical application is a stated choice experiment concerning traffic calming schemes. We find that the random parameter RU-RR mixture model not only outperforms its fixed coefficient counterpart in terms of fit-as expected-but also in terms of plausibility of membership determinants of behavioural class. In line with psychological theories of regret, we find that, compared to respondents who are familiar with the choice context (i.e. the traffic calming scheme), unfamiliar respondents are more likely to be regret minimizers than utility maximizers.",
    author = "Marco Boeri and Riccardo Scarpa and Chorus, {Caspar G.}",
    year = "2014",
    month = "3",
    doi = "10.1016/j.tra.2014.01.003",
    language = "English",
    volume = "61",
    pages = "121--135",
    journal = "Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice",
    issn = "0965-8564",
    publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

    }

    Stated choices and benefit estimates in the context of traffic calming schemes : Utility maximization, regret minimization, or both? / Boeri, Marco; Scarpa, Riccardo; Chorus, Caspar G.

    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 61, 03.2014, p. 121-135.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Stated choices and benefit estimates in the context of traffic calming schemes

    T2 - Utility maximization, regret minimization, or both?

    AU - Boeri, Marco

    AU - Scarpa, Riccardo

    AU - Chorus, Caspar G.

    PY - 2014/3

    Y1 - 2014/3

    N2 - This paper proposes a discrete mixture model which assigns individuals, up to a probability, to either a class of random utility (RU) maximizers or a class of random regret (RR) minimizers, on the basis of their sequence of observed choices. Our proposed model advances the state of the art of RU-RR mixture models by (i) adding and simultaneously estimating a membership model which predicts the probability of belonging to a RU or RR class; (ii) adding a layer of random taste heterogeneity within each behavioural class; and (iii) deriving a welfare measure associated with the RU-RR mixture model and consistent with referendum-voting, which is the adequate mechanism of provision for such local public goods. The context of our empirical application is a stated choice experiment concerning traffic calming schemes. We find that the random parameter RU-RR mixture model not only outperforms its fixed coefficient counterpart in terms of fit-as expected-but also in terms of plausibility of membership determinants of behavioural class. In line with psychological theories of regret, we find that, compared to respondents who are familiar with the choice context (i.e. the traffic calming scheme), unfamiliar respondents are more likely to be regret minimizers than utility maximizers.

    AB - This paper proposes a discrete mixture model which assigns individuals, up to a probability, to either a class of random utility (RU) maximizers or a class of random regret (RR) minimizers, on the basis of their sequence of observed choices. Our proposed model advances the state of the art of RU-RR mixture models by (i) adding and simultaneously estimating a membership model which predicts the probability of belonging to a RU or RR class; (ii) adding a layer of random taste heterogeneity within each behavioural class; and (iii) deriving a welfare measure associated with the RU-RR mixture model and consistent with referendum-voting, which is the adequate mechanism of provision for such local public goods. The context of our empirical application is a stated choice experiment concerning traffic calming schemes. We find that the random parameter RU-RR mixture model not only outperforms its fixed coefficient counterpart in terms of fit-as expected-but also in terms of plausibility of membership determinants of behavioural class. In line with psychological theories of regret, we find that, compared to respondents who are familiar with the choice context (i.e. the traffic calming scheme), unfamiliar respondents are more likely to be regret minimizers than utility maximizers.

    U2 - 10.1016/j.tra.2014.01.003

    DO - 10.1016/j.tra.2014.01.003

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84893485239

    VL - 61

    SP - 121

    EP - 135

    JO - Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

    JF - Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

    SN - 0965-8564

    ER -