Stepping into perpetrators’ shoes: how ingroup transgressions and victimization shape support for retributive justice through perspective-taking with perpetrators

M. Li*, B. Leidner, S. Fernandez-Campos

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)
41 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Three experiments (total N = 1,061) examined the morally disengaging function of perspective-taking with ingroup perpetrators in intergroup conflict. In the context of the Iran–U.S. conflict, Americans who strongly identified with their country showed increased perspective-taking with perpetrators, which in turn led to reduced support for retributive justice in response to the perpetration rather than suffering of intergroup violence (Experiment 1; N = 191). Experiment 2 (N = 294) replicated these findings in the context of the Israel–Syria conflict with Israeli Jews and demonstrated that perspective-taking with ingroup perpetrators serves a similar function as moral disengagement. Experiment 3 (N = 576) manipulated perpetrator perspective-taking, demonstrating its causal effect on support for retributive justice, again moderated by ingroup identification. The negative implications of understanding perpetrators for addressing intergroup transgressions are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)424-438
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume46
Issue number3
Early online date27 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Mar 2020
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Stepping into perpetrators’ shoes: how ingroup transgressions and victimization shape support for retributive justice through perspective-taking with perpetrators'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this