Sugammadex or Neostigmine for prevention of post-operative pulmonary complications after major abdominal or thoracic surgery: study protocol for the SINFONIA (Sugammadex for preventioN oF pOst-operative pulmonary complIcAtions) randomised controlled superiority trial

Jonathan A. Silversides*, Louise Savic, Louise Hiller, Amy Hopkins, Katie Booth, Jennifer Dorey, Richard Smithson, James Mason, Samuel Frempong, Christina May, Ramani Moonesinghe, Ciara M. O’Donnell, Benedict Creagh-Brown, Rebecca Kandiyali, Joyce Yeung, Rupert Pearse, Kirsten Harris, Hannah McNeill, David Vass, Emma PadfieldDalbir Kaur, SINFONIA investigators

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background
Post-operative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are an important source of morbidity and mortality after major abdominal and thoracic surgery. The use of neuromuscular blocking drugs in general anaesthesia is an important risk factor for PPCs. The incomplete reversal of this neuromuscular blockade at the end of surgery leads to residual weakness of respiratory muscles and predisposes to aspiration of pharyngeal contents, hypoventilation, and thus to PPCs such as atelectasis and pneumonia. Two reversal drugs for neuromuscular blocking agents are available: neostigmine and sugammadex. Compared with neostigmine, sugammadex use results in more rapid reversal of neuromuscular blockade, and small clinical efficacy studies have suggested an associated lower incidence of PPCs. The comparative clinical effectiveness of the two drugs in reducing length of hospital stay or mortality is uncertain. Moreover, a potential safety concern with sugammadex is the relatively high incidence of life-threatening allergic reactions in countries where this drug has been widely used over the last decade.

Methods
SINFONIA is a pragmatic, randomised, open-label, parallel group, superiority trial with an internal pilot which aims to compare the clinical and cost effectiveness of the two available drugs for reversal of neuromuscular blockade, sugammadex and neostigmine, in patients aged 50 years or older undergoing major abdominal or non-cardiac thoracic surgery. The trial will randomise 2500 patients from approximately 40 centres in the UK. The primary outcome will be days alive and out of hospital at 30 days (DAH-30), with key secondary outcomes of PPC incidence, quality of life, and mortality up to 180 days. An embedded observational study will investigate the rate of allergic sensitisation following exposure to sugammadex.

Discussion
The SINFONIA trial addresses an important question for anaesthetists and for patients undergoing major abdominal and thoracic surgery. The choice of reversal agent for neuromuscular blockade between sugammadex and neostigmine is currently largely a matter of anaesthetist preference. A growing body of evidence suggests that sugammadex may reduce the incidence of post-operative pulmonary complications relative to neostigmine. This pragmatic clinical effectiveness trial will provide robust evidence as to the effects of the two drugs on patient-centred outcomes such as DAH-30, as well as on cost effectiveness and the incidence of allergic sensitisation.

Trial registration
The trial was registered on the ISRCTN database (https://www.isrctn.com) prior to opening to recruitment (registration no 15109717).


Original languageEnglish
Article number319
Number of pages16
JournalTrials
Volume26
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Aug 2025

Keywords

  • acute respiratory distress syndrome
  • clinical trial
  • neostigmine
  • neuromuscular blockade
  • neuromuscular blocking agents
  • pneumonia
  • postoperative complications
  • respiratory insufficiency
  • Sugammadex

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sugammadex or Neostigmine for prevention of post-operative pulmonary complications after major abdominal or thoracic surgery: study protocol for the SINFONIA (Sugammadex for preventioN oF pOst-operative pulmonary complIcAtions) randomised controlled superiority trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this