Survival outcomes in endometrial cancer patients according to diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Lauren McVicker, Christopher R. Cardwell, Lauren Edge, W Glenn McCluggage, Declan Quinn, James Wylie, Úna McMenamin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Downloads (Pure)


Background: Diabetes is an established risk factor for endometrial cancer development but its impact on prognosis is unclear and epidemiological studies to date have produced inconsistent results. We aimed to conduct the first systematic review and meta-analysis to compare survival outcomes in endometrial cancer patients with and without pre-existing diabetes.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science databases up to February 2022 for observational studies that investigated the association between pre-existing diabetes and cancer-specific survival in endometrial cancer patients. Secondary outcomes included overall survival and progression or recurrence-free survival. Quality assessment of included studies was undertaken using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and a random-effects model was used to produce pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). (PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020196088).

Results: In total, 31 studies were identified comprising 55,475 endometrial cancer patients. Pooled results suggested a worse cancer-specific survival in patients with compared to patients without diabetes (n = 17 studies, HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.00-1.32, I2 = 62%). Similar results were observed for progression or recurrence-free survival (n = 6 studies, HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02-1.47, I2 = 0%) and for overall survival (n = 24 studies, HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.31-1.54, I2 = 46%).

Conclusion: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we show that diabetes is associated with a worse cancer-specific and overall survival in endometrial cancer patients.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBMC Cancer
Publication statusPublished - 20 Apr 2022


Dive into the research topics of 'Survival outcomes in endometrial cancer patients according to diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this