Taking as Giving, Appropriation as Access: Transfers of Land Development Rights and China’s Recent Experiments

Ting Xu, Wei Gong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

89 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Economic development at both the domestic and global levels is associated with increasing tensions which are inextricably linked to the meaning and allocation of property rights, which has a great impact on appropriation of resources and may lead to different paths of development. “Taking”-- the appropriation of private land for public needs -- is a typical example that exhibits those tensions, posing a challenge to the conventional conception of property as individualistic and exclusive rights of possession, use, and disposition and to the associated neoliberal model of development. Should the individual landowner be left to bear the cost of a regulatory intervention which endures to the wider benefit of the whole community? How to mitigate the tensions between private ownership and public regulation? If we take the liberal concept of property, then private property seems to be in constant conflict with public interests and wider social concerns. Meanwhile, community, situating between the state and the individuals, and community’s relationship to development rights, have not provoked enough discussion. The paper explores the different ways land development rights might be seen both in Western, essentially common law systems, and in China, especially now and in view of two case studies. An empirical example in Wugang, China reveals the importance of integrating the “community lens” proposed by Roger Cotterrell into studies of the transfer of land development rights. Reading through the community lens, taking could be giving and appropriation could also be access. This approach provides a new perspective to re-evaluate the relationship between legal appropriation and development.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)411-424
Number of pages14
JournalNorthern Ireland Legal Quarterly
Volume64
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

China
experiment
community
private property
common law
public interest
right of ownership
possession
disposition
regulation
costs
resources
economics

Bibliographical note

8,000 words; part of a special issue on the theme of ‘Legal Appropriation: Taking of and by law’ (editors: Professor Amanda Perry-Kessaris (SOAS) and Dr Ting Xu (QUB)

Keywords

  • property
  • access
  • land development rights

Cite this

@article{1f0cde66315c4a5db437cd4c5b3664cf,
title = "Taking as Giving, Appropriation as Access: Transfers of Land Development Rights and China’s Recent Experiments",
abstract = "Economic development at both the domestic and global levels is associated with increasing tensions which are inextricably linked to the meaning and allocation of property rights, which has a great impact on appropriation of resources and may lead to different paths of development. “Taking”-- the appropriation of private land for public needs -- is a typical example that exhibits those tensions, posing a challenge to the conventional conception of property as individualistic and exclusive rights of possession, use, and disposition and to the associated neoliberal model of development. Should the individual landowner be left to bear the cost of a regulatory intervention which endures to the wider benefit of the whole community? How to mitigate the tensions between private ownership and public regulation? If we take the liberal concept of property, then private property seems to be in constant conflict with public interests and wider social concerns. Meanwhile, community, situating between the state and the individuals, and community’s relationship to development rights, have not provoked enough discussion. The paper explores the different ways land development rights might be seen both in Western, essentially common law systems, and in China, especially now and in view of two case studies. An empirical example in Wugang, China reveals the importance of integrating the “community lens” proposed by Roger Cotterrell into studies of the transfer of land development rights. Reading through the community lens, taking could be giving and appropriation could also be access. This approach provides a new perspective to re-evaluate the relationship between legal appropriation and development.",
keywords = "property, access, land development rights",
author = "Ting Xu and Wei Gong",
note = "8,000 words; part of a special issue on the theme of ‘Legal Appropriation: Taking of and by law’ (editors: Professor Amanda Perry-Kessaris (SOAS) and Dr Ting Xu (QUB)",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "411--424",
journal = "Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly",
issn = "0029-3105",
number = "3",

}

Taking as Giving, Appropriation as Access: Transfers of Land Development Rights and China’s Recent Experiments. / Xu, Ting; Gong, Wei.

In: Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, Vol. 64, No. 3, 2013, p. 411-424.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Taking as Giving, Appropriation as Access: Transfers of Land Development Rights and China’s Recent Experiments

AU - Xu, Ting

AU - Gong, Wei

N1 - 8,000 words; part of a special issue on the theme of ‘Legal Appropriation: Taking of and by law’ (editors: Professor Amanda Perry-Kessaris (SOAS) and Dr Ting Xu (QUB)

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Economic development at both the domestic and global levels is associated with increasing tensions which are inextricably linked to the meaning and allocation of property rights, which has a great impact on appropriation of resources and may lead to different paths of development. “Taking”-- the appropriation of private land for public needs -- is a typical example that exhibits those tensions, posing a challenge to the conventional conception of property as individualistic and exclusive rights of possession, use, and disposition and to the associated neoliberal model of development. Should the individual landowner be left to bear the cost of a regulatory intervention which endures to the wider benefit of the whole community? How to mitigate the tensions between private ownership and public regulation? If we take the liberal concept of property, then private property seems to be in constant conflict with public interests and wider social concerns. Meanwhile, community, situating between the state and the individuals, and community’s relationship to development rights, have not provoked enough discussion. The paper explores the different ways land development rights might be seen both in Western, essentially common law systems, and in China, especially now and in view of two case studies. An empirical example in Wugang, China reveals the importance of integrating the “community lens” proposed by Roger Cotterrell into studies of the transfer of land development rights. Reading through the community lens, taking could be giving and appropriation could also be access. This approach provides a new perspective to re-evaluate the relationship between legal appropriation and development.

AB - Economic development at both the domestic and global levels is associated with increasing tensions which are inextricably linked to the meaning and allocation of property rights, which has a great impact on appropriation of resources and may lead to different paths of development. “Taking”-- the appropriation of private land for public needs -- is a typical example that exhibits those tensions, posing a challenge to the conventional conception of property as individualistic and exclusive rights of possession, use, and disposition and to the associated neoliberal model of development. Should the individual landowner be left to bear the cost of a regulatory intervention which endures to the wider benefit of the whole community? How to mitigate the tensions between private ownership and public regulation? If we take the liberal concept of property, then private property seems to be in constant conflict with public interests and wider social concerns. Meanwhile, community, situating between the state and the individuals, and community’s relationship to development rights, have not provoked enough discussion. The paper explores the different ways land development rights might be seen both in Western, essentially common law systems, and in China, especially now and in view of two case studies. An empirical example in Wugang, China reveals the importance of integrating the “community lens” proposed by Roger Cotterrell into studies of the transfer of land development rights. Reading through the community lens, taking could be giving and appropriation could also be access. This approach provides a new perspective to re-evaluate the relationship between legal appropriation and development.

KW - property

KW - access

KW - land development rights

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 411

EP - 424

JO - Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly

JF - Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly

SN - 0029-3105

IS - 3

ER -