Taking Design to the Street: Reflecting on the Use of Temporary Urban Interventions as Tools for Codesigning Public Spaces

Nuala Flood, Leon Cruickshank

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

85 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article contains a reflection on the practice of using temporary urban interventions to help facilitate the co-design of public spaces. It presents case studies of two public space improvement projects, both of which used temporary urban interventions to co-design public spaces in various ways. This research was undertaken through practice and subsequent reflection on that practice whereby the authors were fully-embedded members of the design teams associated with each of the case studies. Following the completion of the projects, we analysed how these specific urban interventions performed as co-design tools and concluded that such urban interventions have much to offer urban design practitioners seeking to develop public spaces through a co-design approach. The case studies detailed in this article also reveal a range of possible modes through which temporary urban interventions can be deployed as co-design tools. We explore the opportunities and challenges presented by each of the modes and we offer practice-based guidance to practitioners wishing to use urban interventions as co-design tools.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages10
JournalIterations
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2018

Fingerprint

public space

Keywords

  • participatory urban design
  • urban interventions
  • urban probes
  • urban prototypes
  • tactical urbanism
  • generative toolkits
  • DIY urbanism

Cite this

@article{57e1d9f621804b0187d997b9cadc2964,
title = "Taking Design to the Street: Reflecting on the Use of Temporary Urban Interventions as Tools for Codesigning Public Spaces",
abstract = "This article contains a reflection on the practice of using temporary urban interventions to help facilitate the co-design of public spaces. It presents case studies of two public space improvement projects, both of which used temporary urban interventions to co-design public spaces in various ways. This research was undertaken through practice and subsequent reflection on that practice whereby the authors were fully-embedded members of the design teams associated with each of the case studies. Following the completion of the projects, we analysed how these specific urban interventions performed as co-design tools and concluded that such urban interventions have much to offer urban design practitioners seeking to develop public spaces through a co-design approach. The case studies detailed in this article also reveal a range of possible modes through which temporary urban interventions can be deployed as co-design tools. We explore the opportunities and challenges presented by each of the modes and we offer practice-based guidance to practitioners wishing to use urban interventions as co-design tools.",
keywords = "participatory urban design, urban interventions, urban probes, urban prototypes, tactical urbanism, generative toolkits, DIY urbanism",
author = "Nuala Flood and Leon Cruickshank",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
doi = "10.31880/10344/7523",
language = "English",
journal = "Iterations",
issn = "2009-8243",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Taking Design to the Street

T2 - Reflecting on the Use of Temporary Urban Interventions as Tools for Codesigning Public Spaces

AU - Flood, Nuala

AU - Cruickshank, Leon

PY - 2018/12

Y1 - 2018/12

N2 - This article contains a reflection on the practice of using temporary urban interventions to help facilitate the co-design of public spaces. It presents case studies of two public space improvement projects, both of which used temporary urban interventions to co-design public spaces in various ways. This research was undertaken through practice and subsequent reflection on that practice whereby the authors were fully-embedded members of the design teams associated with each of the case studies. Following the completion of the projects, we analysed how these specific urban interventions performed as co-design tools and concluded that such urban interventions have much to offer urban design practitioners seeking to develop public spaces through a co-design approach. The case studies detailed in this article also reveal a range of possible modes through which temporary urban interventions can be deployed as co-design tools. We explore the opportunities and challenges presented by each of the modes and we offer practice-based guidance to practitioners wishing to use urban interventions as co-design tools.

AB - This article contains a reflection on the practice of using temporary urban interventions to help facilitate the co-design of public spaces. It presents case studies of two public space improvement projects, both of which used temporary urban interventions to co-design public spaces in various ways. This research was undertaken through practice and subsequent reflection on that practice whereby the authors were fully-embedded members of the design teams associated with each of the case studies. Following the completion of the projects, we analysed how these specific urban interventions performed as co-design tools and concluded that such urban interventions have much to offer urban design practitioners seeking to develop public spaces through a co-design approach. The case studies detailed in this article also reveal a range of possible modes through which temporary urban interventions can be deployed as co-design tools. We explore the opportunities and challenges presented by each of the modes and we offer practice-based guidance to practitioners wishing to use urban interventions as co-design tools.

KW - participatory urban design

KW - urban interventions

KW - urban probes

KW - urban prototypes

KW - tactical urbanism

KW - generative toolkits

KW - DIY urbanism

U2 - 10.31880/10344/7523

DO - 10.31880/10344/7523

M3 - Article

JO - Iterations

JF - Iterations

SN - 2009-8243

ER -