Teaching good sex: the limits of consent and the role of the virtues

David Archard*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
110 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

I offer an account of sexual ethics, and thus of an education in sexual morality, that tries to make some sense of how a view of consent as central to those ethics might be combined with an education in certain virtues. I do so by exploring what some see as the shortcomings of a standard of consent, namely, how it can deal with instances of prima facie bad sex. I consider and reject various attempts to show that consensuality is sufficient for morally good sex. I then show how a needed supplement to the standard of consent can appeal to a broader view of why consent matters. This in turn connects to those personal and interpersonal virtues that the 2019 Department of Education guidance on relationships and sex education suggests should be taught. Finally, I provide an account of why more than consensuality is needed in the case of sex. In short, I insist on the critical importance of consent but supplement the standard of consent by an appeal to why consent matters and does so especially in the case of sex.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)645-653
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Philosophy of Education
Volume56
Issue number5
Early online date01 Sept 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2022

Keywords

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • ORIGINAL ARTICLES
  • autonomy
  • coercion
  • consent
  • deception
  • ends
  • virtue

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Teaching good sex: the limits of consent and the role of the virtues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this