Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Testing Preference Formation in Learning Design Contingent Valuation Using Advance Information and Repetitive Treatments

  • Claudia Aravena
  • , W. George Hutchinson*
  • , Fredrik Carlsson
  • , David I Matthews
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

361 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Policymakers have largely replaced single-bounded discrete choice valuation by the more statistically efficient repetitive method: double-bounded discrete choice and discrete choice experiments. Repetitive valuation permits classification into rational and irrational preferences: (1) a priori well formed; (2) consistent nonarbitrary values "discovered" through repetition and experience;, (3) consistent but arbitrary values as "shaped" by preceding bid level, and (4) inconsistent and arbitrary values. Policy valuations should demonstrate behaviorally rational preferences. We outline novel methods for testing this in double-bounded discrete choice experiments applied to renewable energy premiums in Chile.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)284-301
JournalLand Economics
Volume94
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 May 2018

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Testing Preference Formation in Learning Design Contingent Valuation Using Advance Information and Repetitive Treatments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this