Abstract
The inclusion of cultural differences in global studies has mostly taken the form of agendas that aim at recognition and democratization on the one hand, or a redemptive historicization on the other. What this paper argues is that a geohistorical reclamation of difference is insufficient to account for the possibility of a decolonial trajectory for humanity without a deeper understanding of the obstacles imposed by the present political economy of representations of “futurity”. I explore the mobilization of futurity as a way to challenge what I refer to as necrochronopolitics, which I am defining as a range of mundane practices that facilitate the reproduction of death-worlds through the systematic erasure of bodies from ‘acceptable’ views of the future. By exploring Afrofuturism, Indigenous Futurism and Queer Futurism, I examine what these aesthetics manifestations reveal about the real and possible, and their disruptive capacities to inspire other time-space realities.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 78-103 |
| Journal | Revista Debates |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 22 Dec 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Culture
- Decoloniality
- Global Politics
- Futurism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The culture of time and the horizons of futurity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver