The Currency Issue

Coree Brown Swan, Bettina Petersohn

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Abstract

The question of currency in an independent Scotland was one of the most contested issues of the referendum debate. This chapter draws attention to the ways in which this area reflected the distinct interpretations of ‘independent statehood’ and sovereignty employed by the two governments and campaigns. The Scottish Government and the Yes side campaigned for the termination of the negatively framed political union, while emphasizing that other unions could and should be maintained in the event of independence. In contrast, the UK Government and No side emphasized that independence would mean the dissolution of all unions, including a shared currency. The current economic and political union was framed positively by the No side while the currency union was said to increase risk, threaten stability, and undermine sovereignty. Overall, both campaigns employed a range of knowledge claims about the feasibility, desirability, and the consequences of the union to advance their position.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationDebating Scotland: Issues of Independence and Union in the 2014 Referendum
EditorsMichael Keating
PublisherOxford University Press
Chapter4
ISBN (Electronic)9780198789819
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Currency Issue'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this