The determinants of performance appraisal systems: A note (Do Brown and Heywood's results for Australia hold up for Britain?)

John Addison, C.R. Belfield

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article offers a replication for Britain of Brown and Heywood's analysis of the determinants of performance appraisal in Australia. Although there are some important limiting differences between our two datasets - the Australia Workplace Industrial Relations Survey (AWIRS) and the Workplace Employment Relations Survey (WERS) - we reach one central point of agreement and one intriguing shared insight. First, performance appraisal is negatively associated with tenure: where employers cannot rely on the carrot of deferred pay or the stick of dismissal to motivate workers, they will tend to rely more on monitoring, ceteris paribus. Second, employer monitoring and performance pay may be complementary. However, consonant with the disparate results from the wider literature, there is more modest agreement on the contribution of specific human resource management practices, and still less on the role of job control.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)521-531
Number of pages11
JournalBritish Journal of Industrial Relations
Volume46
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2008

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • General Business,Management and Accounting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The determinants of performance appraisal systems: A note (Do Brown and Heywood's results for Australia hold up for Britain?)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this