The effect of level of straw bale provision on the behaviour and leg health of commercial broiler chickens

C. L. Bailie, N. E. O'Connell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)
433 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the effect of the number of straw bales (SBs) provided on the behaviour and leg health of commercial broiler chickens. Houses containing ~23 000 broiler chickens were assigned to one of two treatments: (1) access to 30 SBs per house, ‘30SB’ or (2) access to 45 SB per house, ‘45SB’. This equated to bale densities of 1 bale/44 m2 and 1 bale/29 m2 of floor space within houses, respectively. Treatments were applied in one of two houses on a commercial farm, and were replicated over six production cycles. Both houses had windows and were also artificially lit. Behaviour was observed in weeks 3 to5 of the cycle. This involved observations of general behaviour and activity, gait scores (0: perfect to 5: unable to walk) and latency to lie (measured in seconds from when a bird had been encouraged to stand). Production performance and environmental parameters were also measured. SB density had no significant effect on activity levels (P>0.05) or walking ability (P>0.05). However, the average latency to lie was greater in 30SB birds compared with 45SB birds (P<0.05). The incidence of hock burn and podo dermatitis, average BW at slaughter and levels of mortality and culling were unaffected by SB density (P>0.05). The results from this study suggest that increasing SB levels from 1 bale/44 m2 to 1 bale/29 m2 floor space does not lead to significant improvements in the welfare of commercial broiler chickens in windowed houses.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1715-1721
Number of pages7
JournalAnimal
Volume8
Issue number10
Early online date19 Jun 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of level of straw bale provision on the behaviour and leg health of commercial broiler chickens'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this