Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The efficacy of interventions in reducing belief in conspiracy theories: A systematic review

  • Cian O'Mahony*
  • , Maryanne Brassil
  • , Gillian Murphy
  • , Conor Linehan
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Conspiracy beliefs have become a topic of increasing interest among behavioural researchers. While holding conspiracy beliefs has been associated with several detrimental social, personal, and health consequences, little research has been dedicated to systematically reviewing the methods that could reduce conspiracy beliefs. We conducted a systematic review to identify and assess interventions that have sought to counter conspiracy beliefs. Out of 25 studies (total N = 7179), we found that while the majority of interventions were ineffective in terms of changing conspiracy beliefs, several interventions were particularly effective. Interventions that fostered an analytical mindset or taught critical thinking skills were found to be the most effective in terms of changing conspiracy beliefs. Our findings are important as we develop future research to combat conspiracy beliefs.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0280902
Number of pages18
JournalPLOS ONE
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 05 Apr 2023
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The efficacy of interventions in reducing belief in conspiracy theories: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this