'The End of the Irish Poor Law?: Welfare and Healthcare Reform in Revolutionary and Independent Ireland'

Donnacha Sean Lucey

    Research output: Book/ReportBook

    Abstract

    This book explores welfare provision in Ireland from the revolutionary period to the 1940s, This work is a significant addition to the growing historiography of twentieth-century Ireland which moves beyond political history. It demonstrates that concepts of respectability, deservingness, and social class where central dynamics in Irish society and welfare practices. This book provides the first major study of local welfare practices, policies, and attitudes towards poverty and the poor in this era.

    This book’s exploration of the poor law during revolutionary and independent Ireland provides fresh and original insights into this critical juncture in Irish history. It charts the transformation of the former workhouse system into a network of local authority welfare and healthcare institutions including county homes, county and hospital hospitals, and mother and baby homes. This book provides historical context to current day debates and controversies relating to the institutionalisation of unwed mothers and child welfare policies.

    This book undertakes two cases studies on county Kerry and Cork city; also, Irish experiences are placed against the backdrop of wider transnational trends.

    This work has multiple audiences and will appeal to those interested in Irish social, culture, economic and political history. This book will also appeal to historians of welfare, the poor law, and the social history of medicine. It also informs modern-day social affairs.
    Original languageEnglish
    Place of PublicationManchester
    PublisherManchester University Press
    Number of pages300
    ISBN (Print)9780719087578
    Publication statusAccepted - Aug 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of ''The End of the Irish Poor Law?: Welfare and Healthcare Reform in Revolutionary and Independent Ireland''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this