The impact of baseline intraocular pressure on initial treatment response in the LiGHT trial. Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus medication

  • Eamonn T. Fahy
  • , Giovanni Montesano
  • , Anurag Garg
  • , Victoria Vickerstaff
  • , Evgenia Konstantakopoulou
  • , Gus Gazzard*
  • , Mariam Adeleke
  • , Gareth Ambler
  • , Keith Barton
  • , Rupert Bourne
  • , David Broadway
  • , Catey Bunce
  • , Marta Buszewicz
  • , David Crabb
  • , Amanda Davis
  • , David Garway-Heath
  • , Daniel Hornan
  • , Rachael Hunter
  • , Hari Jayaram
  • , Yuzhen Jiang
  • Sheng Lim, Joanna Liput, Timothy Manners, Stephen Morris, Neil Nathwani, Giovanni Ometto, Gary Rubin, Nicholas Strouthidis, Sarah Wilson, Richard Wormald, David Wright, Haogang Zhu, LiGHT Trial Study Group
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The Laser in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) compared with topical hypotensive medication as first-line therapy for ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma. This substudy explored the impact of pretreatment (baseline) intraocular pressure (IOP) on treatment response. 

Design: Post hoc analysis of randomized control trial data. 

Participants: A total of 1146 eyes from 662 patients were included in this analysis: 559 eyes in the SLT group and 587 in the medication group. Methods: Intraocular pressure reduction at 8 weeks after treatment with either SLT or prostaglandin analog (PGA) eye drops was assessed at different levels of baseline IOP, and the groups were compared. Differences in absolute and percentage IOP lowering between SLT and PGA groups were tested with a linear mixed-effects model. Differences in the probability of achieving ≥ 20% IOP lowering between SLT and PGA groups, at different levels of baseline IOP, were estimated using a logistic mixed-effects model. 

Main Outcome Measure: Intraocular pressure-lowering response to SLT versus PGA eye drops. 


Results: Mean IOP was not significantly different between the groups at baseline or 8 weeks after treatment initiation. Both treatments showed greater IOP lowering at higher baseline IOP and less IOP lowering at lower baseline IOP. Selective laser trabeculoplasty tended to achieve more IOP lowering than PGA drops at higher baseline IOP. Prostaglandin analog drops performed better at lower baseline IOP, and the difference compared with SLT, in terms of percentage IOP reduction, was significant at baseline IOP of ≤ 17 mmHg. A significant difference was found in the relationship between baseline IOP and probability of ≥ 20% IOP lowering between the two treatments (P = 0.01), with SLT being more successful than PGA at baseline IOP of more than 22.5 mmHg. 

Conclusions: We confirm previous reports of greater IOP lowering with higher baseline IOP for both SLT and PGA drops. In treatment-naïve eyes, at higher baseline IOP, SLT was more successful at achieving ≥ 20% IOP lowering than PGA drops. At lower baseline IOP, a statistically greater percentage, but not absolute, IOP lowering was seen with PGA drops compared with SLT, although the clinical significance of this is uncertain. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1366-1376
Number of pages11
JournalOphthalmology
Volume131
Issue number12
Early online date02 Jul 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Academy of Ophthalmology

Keywords

  • Baseline intraocular pressure
  • LiGHT
  • Open-angle glaucoma
  • Prostaglandin analog
  • Selective laser trabeculoplasty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of baseline intraocular pressure on initial treatment response in the LiGHT trial. Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus medication'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this