The many lives of border automation: Turbulence, co-ordination and care

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Automated borders promise instantaneous, objective and accurate decisions that efficiently filter the growing mass of mobile people and goods into safe and dangerous categories. We critically interrogate that promise by looking closely at how UK and European border agents reconfigure automated borders through their sense-making activities and everyday working practices. We are not interested in rehearsing a pro- vs. anti-automation debate, but instead illustrate how both positions reproduce a powerful anthropocentrism that effaces the entanglements and co-ordinations between humans and non-humans in border spaces. Drawing from fieldwork with customs officers, immigration officers and airport managers at a UK and a European airport, we illustrate how border agents navigate a turbulent ‘cycle’ of automation that continually overturns assumed hierarchies between humans and technology. The co-ordinated practices engendered by institutional culture, material infrastructures, drug loos and sniffer dogs cannot be captured by a reductive account of automated borders as simply confirming or denying a predetermined, data-driven in/out decision.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)682-706
Number of pages25
JournalSocial Studies of Science
Volume49
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 05 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

automation
airport
anthropocentrism
immigration
manager
infrastructure
drug
Automation
Data-driven
Anthropocentrism
Managers
Drugs
Filter
Entanglement
Institutional Culture
Sensemaking
Field Work
Nonhuman
Immigration
Dog

Keywords

  • borders
  • automation
  • entanglement
  • co-ordination
  • airports

Cite this

@article{1c65730c034343059b5c1b11f9e5eb1e,
title = "The many lives of border automation: Turbulence, co-ordination and care",
abstract = "Automated borders promise instantaneous, objective and accurate decisions that efficiently filter the growing mass of mobile people and goods into safe and dangerous categories. We critically interrogate that promise by looking closely at how UK and European border agents reconfigure automated borders through their sense-making activities and everyday working practices. We are not interested in rehearsing a pro- vs. anti-automation debate, but instead illustrate how both positions reproduce a powerful anthropocentrism that effaces the entanglements and co-ordinations between humans and non-humans in border spaces. Drawing from fieldwork with customs officers, immigration officers and airport managers at a UK and a European airport, we illustrate how border agents navigate a turbulent ‘cycle’ of automation that continually overturns assumed hierarchies between humans and technology. The co-ordinated practices engendered by institutional culture, material infrastructures, drug loos and sniffer dogs cannot be captured by a reductive account of automated borders as simply confirming or denying a predetermined, data-driven in/out decision.",
keywords = "borders, automation, entanglement, co-ordination, airports",
author = "Debbie Lisle and Mike Bourne",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1177/0306312719870868",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "682--706",
journal = "Social Studies of Science",
issn = "0306-3127",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

The many lives of border automation: Turbulence, co-ordination and care. / Lisle, Debbie; Bourne, Mike.

In: Social Studies of Science, Vol. 49, No. 5, 05.09.2019, p. 682-706.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The many lives of border automation: Turbulence, co-ordination and care

AU - Lisle, Debbie

AU - Bourne, Mike

PY - 2019/9/5

Y1 - 2019/9/5

N2 - Automated borders promise instantaneous, objective and accurate decisions that efficiently filter the growing mass of mobile people and goods into safe and dangerous categories. We critically interrogate that promise by looking closely at how UK and European border agents reconfigure automated borders through their sense-making activities and everyday working practices. We are not interested in rehearsing a pro- vs. anti-automation debate, but instead illustrate how both positions reproduce a powerful anthropocentrism that effaces the entanglements and co-ordinations between humans and non-humans in border spaces. Drawing from fieldwork with customs officers, immigration officers and airport managers at a UK and a European airport, we illustrate how border agents navigate a turbulent ‘cycle’ of automation that continually overturns assumed hierarchies between humans and technology. The co-ordinated practices engendered by institutional culture, material infrastructures, drug loos and sniffer dogs cannot be captured by a reductive account of automated borders as simply confirming or denying a predetermined, data-driven in/out decision.

AB - Automated borders promise instantaneous, objective and accurate decisions that efficiently filter the growing mass of mobile people and goods into safe and dangerous categories. We critically interrogate that promise by looking closely at how UK and European border agents reconfigure automated borders through their sense-making activities and everyday working practices. We are not interested in rehearsing a pro- vs. anti-automation debate, but instead illustrate how both positions reproduce a powerful anthropocentrism that effaces the entanglements and co-ordinations between humans and non-humans in border spaces. Drawing from fieldwork with customs officers, immigration officers and airport managers at a UK and a European airport, we illustrate how border agents navigate a turbulent ‘cycle’ of automation that continually overturns assumed hierarchies between humans and technology. The co-ordinated practices engendered by institutional culture, material infrastructures, drug loos and sniffer dogs cannot be captured by a reductive account of automated borders as simply confirming or denying a predetermined, data-driven in/out decision.

KW - borders

KW - automation

KW - entanglement

KW - co-ordination

KW - airports

U2 - 10.1177/0306312719870868

DO - 10.1177/0306312719870868

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 682

EP - 706

JO - Social Studies of Science

JF - Social Studies of Science

SN - 0306-3127

IS - 5

ER -