The Means and Ends of Deliberative Democracy: Rejoinder to Gunn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This rejoinder represents a final installment in a debate between myself and Paul Gunn over the feasibility and desirability of deliberative democracy. Here I argue that our debate has helped clarify an ambivalence in the literature surrounding the ends and means of deliberative democracy. I specify two ways to understand both ends and means, establish their importance in deliberative theory, and show how they can be combined. I conclude by showing how this systemic view incorporates and overcomes several challenges facing modern democracy, such as the necessity of expert authority, the role of partisanship, and the problem of social complexity. © 2017 Critical Review Foundation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)328-350
JournalCritical Review
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Dec 2017

Bibliographical note

Export Date: 19 September 2018

Correspondence Address: Kuyper, J.; Department of Political Science, Stockholm University, Universitetsvägen 10 F, Sweden; email: jonathan.kuyper1@gmail.com

Funding text: Jonathan Kuyper, jonathan.kuyper@gmail.com, Department of Political Science, Stockholm University, Universitetsvägen  F,  , Stockholm, Sweden, thanks Alfred Moore and Jeffrey Friedman for suggestions about the arguments made in this paper. A grant from Riksban-kens Jubileumsfond (P-:) and a grant from the Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg Foundation for “The Democratization of International Organizations through the Involvement of Transnational Actors: Which? How? Why?” made this research possible.

References: Arendt, H., (1961) Between Past and Future, , New York: Viking; Bächtiger, A., Niemeyer, S., Neblo, M., Steenbergen, M., Steiner, J., Disentangling Diversity in Deliberative Democracy: Competing Theories, Their Blind Spots and Complimentaries (2010) Journal of Political Philosophy, 18 (1), pp. 32-63; Bohman, J., Survey Article: The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy (1998) Journal of Political Philosophy, 6 (4), pp. 400-425; Boswell, J., Deliberating Downstream: Countering Democratic Distortions in the Policy Process (2016) Perspectives on Politics, 14 (3), pp. 724-737; Chambers, S., Deliberative Democratic Theory (2003) Annual Review of Political Science, 6, pp. 307-326; Chambers, S., Deliberation and Mass Democracy (2012) Deliberative Systems, , Parkinson J., Mansbridge J., (eds), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,.” In, ed; Christiano, T., Rational Deliberation Among Experts and Citizens (2012) Deliberative Systems, , Parkinson J., Mansbridge J., (eds), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,.” In, ed; Cohen, J., Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy (1989) The Good Polity, , Hamlin A., Pettit P., (eds), Oxford: Blackwell,.” In, ed; Cohen, J., Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy (1996) Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, , Benhabib S., (ed), Princeton: Princeton: University Press,.” In, ed; Disch, L., Parties, Partisanship, and Democratic Politics (2009) Perspectives on Politics, 7 (3), pp. 621-624; Dryzek, J., (2010) Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance, , Oxford: Oxford University Press; Dryzek, J.S., List, C., Social Choice Theory and Deliberative Democracy: A Reconciliation (2003) British Journal of Political Science, 33 (1), pp. 1-28; Elstub, S., The Third Generation of Deliberative Democracy (2010) Political Studies Review, 8 (3), pp. 291-307; Estlund, D., Beyond Fairness and Deliberation: The Epistemic Dimension of Democratic Authority (1997) Deliberative Democracy: Essays in Reason and Politics, , Bohman J., Rehg W., (eds), Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press,.” In, ed; Estlund, D., (2008) Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework, , Princeton: Princeton University Press; Fraser, N., Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy (1990) Social Text, 25-26, pp. 56-80; Fung, A., Deliberation before the Revolution: Toward an Ethics of Deliberative Democracy in an Unjust World (2005) Political Theory, 33 (3), pp. 397-419; Grönlund, K., Herne, K., Setälä, M., Does enclave deliberation polarize opinions? (2015) Political Behavior, 37 (4), pp. 995-1020; Gunn, P., (2013) Democratic Deliberation in the Modern World, , London: Routledge, ed; Gunn, P., Deliberative Democracy and the Systemic Turn: Reply to Kuyper (2017) Critical Review, 29 (1), pp. 88-119; Gutmann, A., Thompson, D., (1996) Democracy and Disagreement, , Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, and; Habermas, J., (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, , Boston: Beacon, trans; Habermas, J., (1998) On the Pragmatics of Communication, , Cooke M., (ed), Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, ed; Kuyper, J., Democratic Deliberation in the Modern World (2015) Critical Review, 27 (1), pp. 49-63; Lafont, C., Is the Ideal of Deliberative Democracy Coherent? (2006) Deliberative Democracy and Its Discontents, , Besson S., Martí J.L., (eds), Aldershot, England: Ashgate, ” In, ed; Landemore, H., (2013) Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many, , Princeton: Princeton University Press; List, C., Luskin, R.C., Fishkin, J.S., McLean, I., Deliberation, Single-Peakedness, and the Possibility of Meaningful Democracy: Evidence from Deliberative Polls (2013) Journal of Politics, 75 (1), pp. 80-95; Manin, B., On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation (1987) Political Theory, 15 (3), pp. 338-368; Mansbridge, J., Everyday Talk in the Deliberative System (1999) Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, , Macedo S.P., (ed), Oxford: Oxford University Press,.” In, ed; Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Estlund, D., Føllesdal, A., Fung, A., Lafont, C., Luis Martí, J., The Place of Self-Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy (2010) Journal of Political Philosophy, 18 (1), pp. 64-100. , with, and; Martí, J.L., The Epistemic Conception of Deliberative Democracy Defended (2006) Deliberative Democracy and Its Discontents, , Besson S., Martí J.L., (eds) In, ed; Min, J.B., Politics Must Get It Right Sometimes: Reply to Muirhead (2016) Critical Review, 28 (3), pp. 404-411; Morrell, M., (2010) Empathy and Democracy: Feeling, Thinking, and Deliberation, , University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press; Muirhead, R., The Epistemic Basis for Political Opposition: Rejoinder to Min (2016) Critical Review, 28 (3-4), pp. 412-419; Owen, D., Smith, G., Survey Article: Deliberation, Democracy, and the Systemic Turn (2015) Journal of Political Philosophy, 23 (2), pp. 213-234; Pennington, M., (2013) Democracy and the Deliberative Conceit, , In Gunn 2013; Quirk, P.J., Making It Up on Volume: Are Larger Groups Really Smarter? (2014) Critical Review, 26 (1-2), pp. 129-150; Rawls, J., (1971) A Theory of Justice, , Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press; Rawls, J., (1993) Political Liberalism, , New York: Columbia University Press; Rousseau, J.-J., (1997) The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, , Gourevitch V., (ed), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, [1762], ed; Sanders, L., Against Deliberation (1997) Political Theory, 25 (3), pp. 347-376; White, J., Ypi, L., On Partisan Political Justification (2011) American Political Science Review, 105 (2), pp. 381-396; Williams, B., (2005) In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument, , Hawthorn G., (ed), Oxford: Princeton University Press, ed; Young, I.M., (2002) Inclusion and Democracy, , Oxford: Oxford University Press

Keywords

  • deliberative democracy
  • deliberative systems
  • epistemic democracy
  • partisanship
  • Paul Gunn

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Means and Ends of Deliberative Democracy: Rejoinder to Gunn'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this