The Option of Association: The United Kingdom Post-Brexit and the European Free Trade Association

Cenni Nagy, David Phinnemore

Research output: Other contribution

Abstract

The UK government’s plans for Brexit remain largely a work in progress. To date, few details on the proposed scope and intensity of future UK-EU relations have been provided. There is also little clarity on the UK’s proposed trade and economic relations with non-EU countries. As an EU member, the UK participates in a range of free trade agreements with non-EU countries, both in Europe and in the rest of the world. In case of a «hard Brexit» and the UK leaving the EU’s customs union, the UK would lose the preferential market access these agreements provide.
The UK could try to negotiate replacement agreements with each European and non-European country. However, this could prove a long and very difficult task, given the complexity of trade agreements today. One way to address this challenge would be for the UK to become a member of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA).
Joining EFTA – an intergovernmental organization that serves as a platform for free trade between its members – would allow some continuity to be maintained in UK trade relations. This is not only true for trade with Switzerland and Norway – two significant markets for the UK – but also for many extra-European markets with which EFTA has concluded free trade agreements. EFTA membership, far less demanding legally, politically and financially than EU membership, has its attractions. However, it also contains a commitment to establish the free movement of persons with the other EFTA countries. This could prove highly problematic for the UK government given domestic political debate regarding immigration.
How then could the UK proceed to develop constructive relations with EFTA and avail of some, at least, of the attractions of membership? One scenario, would be to seek an association with EFTA. This association could be similar to the arrangement concluded between Finland and EFTA from the 1960s to the 1980s. A «UKEFTA» association could secure the trade benefits of EFTA membership while not necessarily involving the same level of political commitment to which the existing members have signed up, especially in matters related to immigration and accession to all trade agreements concluded by EFTA. A UKEFTA association could be a temporary or permanent flexible arrangement depending on the preferences of all the stakeholders. The combination of partial continuity and evident flexibility offered by association could be an asset for the UK as it navigates the many uncertainties of Brexit.
Original languageEnglish
TypePolicy Brief
Media of outputPaper
PublisherForaus
Number of pages20
Place of PublicationGeneva
Publication statusPublished - 22 Jun 2017

Fingerprint

EFTA
free trade
EU
trade relation
immigration
continuity
customs union
European market
economic relations
market
political activity
Switzerland
Finland
Norway
assets
flexibility

Keywords

  • Brexit
  • EFTA
  • Association

Cite this

@misc{d1da42d451e04d4486b0f8c616fbd89e,
title = "The Option of Association: The United Kingdom Post-Brexit and the European Free Trade Association",
abstract = "The UK government’s plans for Brexit remain largely a work in progress. To date, few details on the proposed scope and intensity of future UK-EU relations have been provided. There is also little clarity on the UK’s proposed trade and economic relations with non-EU countries. As an EU member, the UK participates in a range of free trade agreements with non-EU countries, both in Europe and in the rest of the world. In case of a «hard Brexit» and the UK leaving the EU’s customs union, the UK would lose the preferential market access these agreements provide.The UK could try to negotiate replacement agreements with each European and non-European country. However, this could prove a long and very difficult task, given the complexity of trade agreements today. One way to address this challenge would be for the UK to become a member of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA).Joining EFTA – an intergovernmental organization that serves as a platform for free trade between its members – would allow some continuity to be maintained in UK trade relations. This is not only true for trade with Switzerland and Norway – two significant markets for the UK – but also for many extra-European markets with which EFTA has concluded free trade agreements. EFTA membership, far less demanding legally, politically and financially than EU membership, has its attractions. However, it also contains a commitment to establish the free movement of persons with the other EFTA countries. This could prove highly problematic for the UK government given domestic political debate regarding immigration.How then could the UK proceed to develop constructive relations with EFTA and avail of some, at least, of the attractions of membership? One scenario, would be to seek an association with EFTA. This association could be similar to the arrangement concluded between Finland and EFTA from the 1960s to the 1980s. A «UKEFTA» association could secure the trade benefits of EFTA membership while not necessarily involving the same level of political commitment to which the existing members have signed up, especially in matters related to immigration and accession to all trade agreements concluded by EFTA. A UKEFTA association could be a temporary or permanent flexible arrangement depending on the preferences of all the stakeholders. The combination of partial continuity and evident flexibility offered by association could be an asset for the UK as it navigates the many uncertainties of Brexit.",
keywords = "Brexit, EFTA, Association",
author = "Cenni Nagy and David Phinnemore",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "22",
language = "English",
publisher = "Foraus",
type = "Other",

}

The Option of Association: The United Kingdom Post-Brexit and the European Free Trade Association. / Nagy, Cenni; Phinnemore, David.

20 p. Geneva : Foraus. 2017, Policy Brief.

Research output: Other contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - The Option of Association: The United Kingdom Post-Brexit and the European Free Trade Association

AU - Nagy, Cenni

AU - Phinnemore, David

PY - 2017/6/22

Y1 - 2017/6/22

N2 - The UK government’s plans for Brexit remain largely a work in progress. To date, few details on the proposed scope and intensity of future UK-EU relations have been provided. There is also little clarity on the UK’s proposed trade and economic relations with non-EU countries. As an EU member, the UK participates in a range of free trade agreements with non-EU countries, both in Europe and in the rest of the world. In case of a «hard Brexit» and the UK leaving the EU’s customs union, the UK would lose the preferential market access these agreements provide.The UK could try to negotiate replacement agreements with each European and non-European country. However, this could prove a long and very difficult task, given the complexity of trade agreements today. One way to address this challenge would be for the UK to become a member of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA).Joining EFTA – an intergovernmental organization that serves as a platform for free trade between its members – would allow some continuity to be maintained in UK trade relations. This is not only true for trade with Switzerland and Norway – two significant markets for the UK – but also for many extra-European markets with which EFTA has concluded free trade agreements. EFTA membership, far less demanding legally, politically and financially than EU membership, has its attractions. However, it also contains a commitment to establish the free movement of persons with the other EFTA countries. This could prove highly problematic for the UK government given domestic political debate regarding immigration.How then could the UK proceed to develop constructive relations with EFTA and avail of some, at least, of the attractions of membership? One scenario, would be to seek an association with EFTA. This association could be similar to the arrangement concluded between Finland and EFTA from the 1960s to the 1980s. A «UKEFTA» association could secure the trade benefits of EFTA membership while not necessarily involving the same level of political commitment to which the existing members have signed up, especially in matters related to immigration and accession to all trade agreements concluded by EFTA. A UKEFTA association could be a temporary or permanent flexible arrangement depending on the preferences of all the stakeholders. The combination of partial continuity and evident flexibility offered by association could be an asset for the UK as it navigates the many uncertainties of Brexit.

AB - The UK government’s plans for Brexit remain largely a work in progress. To date, few details on the proposed scope and intensity of future UK-EU relations have been provided. There is also little clarity on the UK’s proposed trade and economic relations with non-EU countries. As an EU member, the UK participates in a range of free trade agreements with non-EU countries, both in Europe and in the rest of the world. In case of a «hard Brexit» and the UK leaving the EU’s customs union, the UK would lose the preferential market access these agreements provide.The UK could try to negotiate replacement agreements with each European and non-European country. However, this could prove a long and very difficult task, given the complexity of trade agreements today. One way to address this challenge would be for the UK to become a member of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA).Joining EFTA – an intergovernmental organization that serves as a platform for free trade between its members – would allow some continuity to be maintained in UK trade relations. This is not only true for trade with Switzerland and Norway – two significant markets for the UK – but also for many extra-European markets with which EFTA has concluded free trade agreements. EFTA membership, far less demanding legally, politically and financially than EU membership, has its attractions. However, it also contains a commitment to establish the free movement of persons with the other EFTA countries. This could prove highly problematic for the UK government given domestic political debate regarding immigration.How then could the UK proceed to develop constructive relations with EFTA and avail of some, at least, of the attractions of membership? One scenario, would be to seek an association with EFTA. This association could be similar to the arrangement concluded between Finland and EFTA from the 1960s to the 1980s. A «UKEFTA» association could secure the trade benefits of EFTA membership while not necessarily involving the same level of political commitment to which the existing members have signed up, especially in matters related to immigration and accession to all trade agreements concluded by EFTA. A UKEFTA association could be a temporary or permanent flexible arrangement depending on the preferences of all the stakeholders. The combination of partial continuity and evident flexibility offered by association could be an asset for the UK as it navigates the many uncertainties of Brexit.

KW - Brexit

KW - EFTA

KW - Association

M3 - Other contribution

PB - Foraus

CY - Geneva

ER -