Abstract
This paper examines the methodological choices of researchers studying the HR practices–outcome relationship via a content analysis of 281 studies published across the last twenty years. The prevalence and trajectory of change over time are reported for a wide range of methodological choices relevant to internal, external, construct, and statistical conclusion validity. While the results indicate a high incidence of potentially problematic cross-sectional, single informant, and single level designs, they also reveal significant improvements over time across many validity relevant methodological choices. This broad based improvement in the methodological underpinnings of HR research suggests that researchers and practitioners can view the findings reported in the HR literature with increasing confidence. Directions for future research are provided.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 887-913 |
Number of pages | 27 |
Journal | Human Resource Management |
Volume | 56 |
Issue number | 6 |
Early online date | 14 Aug 2016 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2017 |