The Pervasiveness and Trajectory of Methodological Choices: A 20 Year Review of Human Resource Management Research

Hugh T. J. Bainbridge, Karin Sanders, Julie A. Cogin, Cai-Hui Lin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines the methodological choices of researchers studying the HR practices–outcome relationship via a content analysis of 281 studies published across the last twenty years. The prevalence and trajectory of change over time are reported for a wide range of methodological choices relevant to internal, external, construct, and statistical conclusion validity. While the results indicate a high incidence of potentially problematic cross-sectional, single informant, and single level designs, they also reveal significant improvements over time across many validity relevant methodological choices. This broad based improvement in the methodological underpinnings of HR research suggests that researchers and practitioners can view the findings reported in the HR literature with increasing confidence. Directions for future research are provided.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)887-913
Number of pages27
JournalHuman Resource Management
Volume56
Issue number6
Early online date14 Aug 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Pervasiveness and Trajectory of Methodological Choices: A 20 Year Review of Human Resource Management Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this