The Philosophy and Practice of Interpretivist Research in Entrepreneurship Quality, Validation, and Trust

Claire M. Leitch, Frances M. Hill, Richard T. Harrison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

130 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Knowledge production in entrepreneurship requires inclusivity as well as diversity and pluralism in research perspectives and approaches. In this article, the authors address concerns about interpretivist research regarding validity, reliability, objectivity, generalizability, and communicability of results that militate against its more widespread acceptance. Following the nonfoundationalist argument that all observation is theory-laden, context specific, and that there are no external criteria against which to assess research design and execution and the data produced, the authors propose that quality must be internalized within the underlying research philosophy rather than something to be tested upon completion. This requires a shift from the notion of validity as an outcome to validation as a process. To elucidate this, they provide a guiding framework and present a case illustration that will assist an interpretivist entrepreneurship researcher to establish and demonstrate the quality of their work.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-84
Number of pages18
JournalOrganizational Research Methods
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Strategy and Management
  • Decision Sciences(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Philosophy and Practice of Interpretivist Research in Entrepreneurship Quality, Validation, and Trust'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this