Abstract
Four experiments examined people's responses to intergroup violence either committed or suffered by their own group. Experiment 1 demonstrated that Serbs who strongly glorified Serbia were more supportive of future violence against, and less willing to reconcile with, Bosniaks after reading about Serbian victimization by Bosniaks rather than Serbian transgressions against Bosniaks. Replicating these effects with Americans in the context of American–Iranian tensions, Experiment 2 further showed that demands for retributive justice explained why high glorifiers showed asymmetrical reactions to ingroup victimization vs. perpetration. Again in the Serb and the American context, respectively, Experiments 3 and 4 demonstrated that post-conflict international criminal tribunals can help satisfy victim group members' desire for retributive justice, and thereby reduce their support for future violence and increase their willingness to reconcile with the perpetrator group. The role of retributive justice and the use of international criminal justice in intergroup conflict (reduction) are discussed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | O133-O151 |
Journal | European Journal of Social Psychology |
Volume | 48 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 07 Aug 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 01 Mar 2018 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Winner of EJSP Early Career Best Article AwardFingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The role of retributive justice and the use of international criminal tribunals in post-conflict reconciliation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Prizes
-
European Journal of Social Psychology Early Career Best Article Award
Li, M. (Recipient), 2018
Prize: Prize (including medals and awards)