The significance of conflicting discourses in a professional degree: Assessment in undergraduate fine art practice

Dina Zoe Belluigi*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper expands on empirical research which revealed that, whether or not an institution's interpretative community was explicitly informed by outcomes-based assessment, the more powerful and implicit discourses that emerged in assessment practices were those of their professional practice and academic traditions. Tensions, between the emerging dominant discourses, had their roots in academic perspectives and traditions; professional practice(s) and ways of being; and the more recent educational development discourses. The significance of these tensions for the discursive positioning of staff and students is discussed, with suggestions made for possible ways to negotiate these problematics more purposefully

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)209-221
Number of pages13
JournalDiscourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education
Volume38
Issue number2
Early online date20 Aug 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 04 Mar 2017

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • assessment
  • educational development
  • interpretative communities
  • objectivity
  • practice-based
  • Professional

Cite this