Timing and trajectory in rhythm production

Michail Doumas, Alan M. Wing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)
91 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The Wing-Kristofferson movement timing model (A. M. Wing & A. B. Kristofferson, 1973a, 1973b) distinguishes central timer and motor implementation processes. Previous studies have shown that increases in interresponse interval (IRI) variability with mean IRI are due to central timer processes, not motor implementation. The authors examine whether this is true with IRI duration changes in binary rhythm production. Ten participants provided IRI and movement data in bimanual synchronous tapping under equal (isochronous) and alternating (rhythm) interval conditions. Movement trajectory changes were observed with IRI duration (300, 500, or 833 ms) and for 500-ms IRIs produced in rhythm contexts (300/500 ms, 500/833 ms). However, application of the Wing-Kristofferson model showed that duration and context effects on IRI variability were attributable largely to timer processes with relatively little effect on motor processes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)442-455
Number of pages14
JournalJOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2007

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Timing and trajectory in rhythm production'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this