Trying similarity, doing difference: The role of interviewer self-disclosure in interview talk with young people

Jackie Abell, Abigail Locke, Susan Condor, Stephen Gibson, Clifford Stevenson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Advocates of semi-structured interview techniques have often argued that rapport may be built, and power inequalities between interviewer and respondent counteracted, by strategic self-disclosure on the part of the interviewer. Strategies that use self-disclosure to construct similarity between interviewer and respondent rely on the presumption that the respondent will in fact interpret the interviewer's behaviour in this way. In this article we examine the role of interviewer self-disclosure using data drawn from three projects involving interviews with young people. We consider how an interviewer's attempts to ‘do similarity’ may be interpreted variously as displays of similarity or, ironically, as indicators of difference by the participant, and map the implications that this may have for subsequent interview dialogue. A particular object of concern relates to the ways in which self-disclosing acts may function in the negotiation of category entitlement within interview interactions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)221-244
Number of pages23
JournalQualitative Research
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2006

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Trying similarity, doing difference: The role of interviewer self-disclosure in interview talk with young people'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this