Abstract
When the use of tylosin as a feed additive was forbidden by Council Regulation 2821/98, the necessity of a chemical confirmation method for the monitoring of the ban was created. Recently a method was developed for the detection of tylosin in animal feed by means of LC-MS/MS. During the validation high deviating values for the decision limit, detection capability, and repeatability for tylosin in cattle feed were observed, and the presence of urea and the formation of a tylosin urea adduct (TUA) were suggested as possible explanations. In this study two hydrolysis approaches for the TUA adduct were compared, namely, a chemical hydrolysis and an enzymatic hydrolysis with urease. The latter yielded a more complete hydrolysis of urea and was used for further validation. The recovery increased by ∼15-25% depending on the amount of urea present in the feed (0.5-2%). The decision limit and detection capability were hardly influenced by the enzymatic hydrolysis.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2803-2806 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 19 May 2004 |
Keywords
- Animal feed
- LC-MS/MS
- Tylosin
- Urea adduct
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Chemistry
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Tylosin Detection in Animal Feed by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry with Enzymatic Hydrolysis of the Tylosin Urea Adduct'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver