Understanding digital inequality: a theoretical kaleidoscope

Caroline Kuhn, Su-Ming Khoo*, Laura Czerniewicz, Warren Lilley, Swati Bute, Aisling Crean, Sandra Abegglen, Tom Burns, Sandra Sinfield, Petar Jandric, Jeremy Knox, Alison MacKenzie

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)
205 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The pandemic affected more than 1.5 billion students and youth, and the most vulnerable learners were hit hardest, making digital inequality in educational settings impossible to overlook. Given this reality, we, all educators, came together to find ways to understand and address some of these inequalities. As a product of this collaboration, we propose a methodological toolkit: a theoretical kaleidoscope to examine and critique the constitutive elements and dimensions of digital inequalities. We argue that such a tool is helpful when a critical attitude to examine ‘the ideology of digitalism’, its concomitant inequalities, and the huge losses it entails for human flourishing seems urgent. In the paper, we describe different theoretical approaches that can be used for the kaleidoscope. We give relevant examples of each theory. We argue that the postdigital does not mean that the digital is over, rather that it has mutated into new power structures that are less evident but no less insidious as they continue to govern socio-technical infrastructures, geopolitics, and markets. In this sense, it is vital to find tools that allow us to shed light on such invisible and pervasive power structures and the consequences in the daily lives of so many.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPostdigital Science and Education
Early online date23 Mar 2023
DOIs
Publication statusEarly online date - 23 Mar 2023

Keywords

  • theoretical kaleidoscope
  • toolkit
  • methodology
  • digital inequalities
  • postdigital
  • collaborative writing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding digital inequality: a theoretical kaleidoscope'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this