Understanding Middle Neolithic food and farming in and around the Stonehenge World Heritage Site: An integrated approach

Fay Worley, Richard Madgwick, Ruth Pelling, Peter Marshall, Jane A. Evans, Angela L. Lamb, Inés L. López-Dóriga, Christopher Bronk Ramsey, Elaine Dunbar, Paula Reimer, John Vallender, David Roberts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Little synthesis of evidence for Middle Neolithic food and farming in Wiltshire, particularly in and around the Stonehenge World Heritage Site (WHS) has been possible, until now, due to a paucity of assemblages. The excavation of a cluster of five Middle Neolithic pits and an inhumation burial at West Amesbury Farm (WAF) has prompted a review of our understanding of pit sites of this period from the county. Bioarchaeological assemblages are used to investigate evidence for the consumption of animal and plant-based foods, and for agricultural and pastoral farming. For the first time Middle Neolithic zooarchaeological evidence, including strontium isotope data, is considered alongside archaeobotanical data, and radiocarbon dating. The absence of cultivated plants from WAF and contemporary sites in the county is consistent with the hypothesis that the reduction in cereal cultivation and greater reliance of wild plants witnessed in the later part of the Neolithic in southern England began in the Middle Neolithic. The zooarchaeological evidence from the same sites demonstrates that the shift away from cereal cultivation may be concurrent with, rather than earlier than, an increase in the relative proportion of deposited pig bones relative to cattle. Both cattle and pigs deposited in pits at WAF have strontium and sulphur isotope values consistent with the local biosphere, and therefore were potentially raised in the area. Zooarchaeological data from WAF compliments that from human dental calculus and lipid residues in associated Peterborough Ware pottery that local cattle husbandry included exploitation of dairy. It also highlights the presence of consistent food preparation methods between pits as seen through butchery practice. The faunal and archaeobotanical remains from contemporary pit deposits suggest that similar farming and subsistence strategies can be proposed across the county, though with some inter-site variation in deposition. Together these excavated pit sites are likely to represent only a sample of those present in the area. Application of a similar integrated approach to material from other Middle Neolithic pits holds potential for better understanding of food and farming in this previously neglected period.

LanguageEnglish
Article number101838
JournalJournal of Archaeological Science: Reports
Volume26
Early online date12 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Aug 2019

Fingerprint

farm
food
evidence
biosphere
funeral
exploitation
animal
Stonehenge
World Heritage Site
Middle Neolithic
Food
Farming
Values
Farm
Cattle
Pig
Assemblages
Cereals

Keywords

  • Archaeobotany
  • Diet
  • Multi-isotope analysis
  • Neolithic
  • Zooarchaeology

Cite this

Worley, Fay ; Madgwick, Richard ; Pelling, Ruth ; Marshall, Peter ; Evans, Jane A. ; Lamb, Angela L. ; López-Dóriga, Inés L. ; Bronk Ramsey, Christopher ; Dunbar, Elaine ; Reimer, Paula ; Vallender, John ; Roberts, David. / Understanding Middle Neolithic food and farming in and around the Stonehenge World Heritage Site : An integrated approach. In: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports. 2019 ; Vol. 26.
@article{e370cf6d8b5343e39de37c64e306fc23,
title = "Understanding Middle Neolithic food and farming in and around the Stonehenge World Heritage Site: An integrated approach",
abstract = "Little synthesis of evidence for Middle Neolithic food and farming in Wiltshire, particularly in and around the Stonehenge World Heritage Site (WHS) has been possible, until now, due to a paucity of assemblages. The excavation of a cluster of five Middle Neolithic pits and an inhumation burial at West Amesbury Farm (WAF) has prompted a review of our understanding of pit sites of this period from the county. Bioarchaeological assemblages are used to investigate evidence for the consumption of animal and plant-based foods, and for agricultural and pastoral farming. For the first time Middle Neolithic zooarchaeological evidence, including strontium isotope data, is considered alongside archaeobotanical data, and radiocarbon dating. The absence of cultivated plants from WAF and contemporary sites in the county is consistent with the hypothesis that the reduction in cereal cultivation and greater reliance of wild plants witnessed in the later part of the Neolithic in southern England began in the Middle Neolithic. The zooarchaeological evidence from the same sites demonstrates that the shift away from cereal cultivation may be concurrent with, rather than earlier than, an increase in the relative proportion of deposited pig bones relative to cattle. Both cattle and pigs deposited in pits at WAF have strontium and sulphur isotope values consistent with the local biosphere, and therefore were potentially raised in the area. Zooarchaeological data from WAF compliments that from human dental calculus and lipid residues in associated Peterborough Ware pottery that local cattle husbandry included exploitation of dairy. It also highlights the presence of consistent food preparation methods between pits as seen through butchery practice. The faunal and archaeobotanical remains from contemporary pit deposits suggest that similar farming and subsistence strategies can be proposed across the county, though with some inter-site variation in deposition. Together these excavated pit sites are likely to represent only a sample of those present in the area. Application of a similar integrated approach to material from other Middle Neolithic pits holds potential for better understanding of food and farming in this previously neglected period.",
keywords = "Archaeobotany, Diet, Multi-isotope analysis, Neolithic, Zooarchaeology",
author = "Fay Worley and Richard Madgwick and Ruth Pelling and Peter Marshall and Evans, {Jane A.} and Lamb, {Angela L.} and L{\'o}pez-D{\'o}riga, {In{\'e}s L.} and {Bronk Ramsey}, Christopher and Elaine Dunbar and Paula Reimer and John Vallender and David Roberts",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.05.003",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
journal = "Journal of Archaeological Science Reports",
issn = "2352-409X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Worley, F, Madgwick, R, Pelling, R, Marshall, P, Evans, JA, Lamb, AL, López-Dóriga, IL, Bronk Ramsey, C, Dunbar, E, Reimer, P, Vallender, J & Roberts, D 2019, 'Understanding Middle Neolithic food and farming in and around the Stonehenge World Heritage Site: An integrated approach', Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, vol. 26, 101838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.05.003

Understanding Middle Neolithic food and farming in and around the Stonehenge World Heritage Site : An integrated approach. / Worley, Fay; Madgwick, Richard; Pelling, Ruth; Marshall, Peter; Evans, Jane A.; Lamb, Angela L.; López-Dóriga, Inés L.; Bronk Ramsey, Christopher; Dunbar, Elaine; Reimer, Paula; Vallender, John; Roberts, David.

In: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, Vol. 26, 101838, 01.08.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding Middle Neolithic food and farming in and around the Stonehenge World Heritage Site

T2 - Journal of Archaeological Science Reports

AU - Worley, Fay

AU - Madgwick, Richard

AU - Pelling, Ruth

AU - Marshall, Peter

AU - Evans, Jane A.

AU - Lamb, Angela L.

AU - López-Dóriga, Inés L.

AU - Bronk Ramsey, Christopher

AU - Dunbar, Elaine

AU - Reimer, Paula

AU - Vallender, John

AU - Roberts, David

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - Little synthesis of evidence for Middle Neolithic food and farming in Wiltshire, particularly in and around the Stonehenge World Heritage Site (WHS) has been possible, until now, due to a paucity of assemblages. The excavation of a cluster of five Middle Neolithic pits and an inhumation burial at West Amesbury Farm (WAF) has prompted a review of our understanding of pit sites of this period from the county. Bioarchaeological assemblages are used to investigate evidence for the consumption of animal and plant-based foods, and for agricultural and pastoral farming. For the first time Middle Neolithic zooarchaeological evidence, including strontium isotope data, is considered alongside archaeobotanical data, and radiocarbon dating. The absence of cultivated plants from WAF and contemporary sites in the county is consistent with the hypothesis that the reduction in cereal cultivation and greater reliance of wild plants witnessed in the later part of the Neolithic in southern England began in the Middle Neolithic. The zooarchaeological evidence from the same sites demonstrates that the shift away from cereal cultivation may be concurrent with, rather than earlier than, an increase in the relative proportion of deposited pig bones relative to cattle. Both cattle and pigs deposited in pits at WAF have strontium and sulphur isotope values consistent with the local biosphere, and therefore were potentially raised in the area. Zooarchaeological data from WAF compliments that from human dental calculus and lipid residues in associated Peterborough Ware pottery that local cattle husbandry included exploitation of dairy. It also highlights the presence of consistent food preparation methods between pits as seen through butchery practice. The faunal and archaeobotanical remains from contemporary pit deposits suggest that similar farming and subsistence strategies can be proposed across the county, though with some inter-site variation in deposition. Together these excavated pit sites are likely to represent only a sample of those present in the area. Application of a similar integrated approach to material from other Middle Neolithic pits holds potential for better understanding of food and farming in this previously neglected period.

AB - Little synthesis of evidence for Middle Neolithic food and farming in Wiltshire, particularly in and around the Stonehenge World Heritage Site (WHS) has been possible, until now, due to a paucity of assemblages. The excavation of a cluster of five Middle Neolithic pits and an inhumation burial at West Amesbury Farm (WAF) has prompted a review of our understanding of pit sites of this period from the county. Bioarchaeological assemblages are used to investigate evidence for the consumption of animal and plant-based foods, and for agricultural and pastoral farming. For the first time Middle Neolithic zooarchaeological evidence, including strontium isotope data, is considered alongside archaeobotanical data, and radiocarbon dating. The absence of cultivated plants from WAF and contemporary sites in the county is consistent with the hypothesis that the reduction in cereal cultivation and greater reliance of wild plants witnessed in the later part of the Neolithic in southern England began in the Middle Neolithic. The zooarchaeological evidence from the same sites demonstrates that the shift away from cereal cultivation may be concurrent with, rather than earlier than, an increase in the relative proportion of deposited pig bones relative to cattle. Both cattle and pigs deposited in pits at WAF have strontium and sulphur isotope values consistent with the local biosphere, and therefore were potentially raised in the area. Zooarchaeological data from WAF compliments that from human dental calculus and lipid residues in associated Peterborough Ware pottery that local cattle husbandry included exploitation of dairy. It also highlights the presence of consistent food preparation methods between pits as seen through butchery practice. The faunal and archaeobotanical remains from contemporary pit deposits suggest that similar farming and subsistence strategies can be proposed across the county, though with some inter-site variation in deposition. Together these excavated pit sites are likely to represent only a sample of those present in the area. Application of a similar integrated approach to material from other Middle Neolithic pits holds potential for better understanding of food and farming in this previously neglected period.

KW - Archaeobotany

KW - Diet

KW - Multi-isotope analysis

KW - Neolithic

KW - Zooarchaeology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067034121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.05.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.05.003

M3 - Article

VL - 26

JO - Journal of Archaeological Science Reports

JF - Journal of Archaeological Science Reports

SN - 2352-409X

M1 - 101838

ER -