Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Unemployment Duration: Competing and Defective Risks

  • John Addison
  • , P. Portugal

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This paper examines the determinants of unemployment duration in a competing risks framework with two destination states: inactivity and employment. The innovation is the recognition of defective risks. A polynomial hazard function is used to differentiate between two possible sources of infinite durations. The first is produced by a random process of unlucky draws, the second by workers rejecting a destination state. The evidence favors the mover-stayer model over the search model. Refinement of the former approach, using a more flexible baseline hazard function, produces a robust and more convincing explanation for positive and zero transition rates out of unemployment.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)156-191
Number of pages36
JournalThe Journal of Human Resources
Volume38(1)
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2003

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Strategy and Management
  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Unemployment Duration: Competing and Defective Risks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this