Abstract
This paper examines the determinants of unemployment duration in a competing risks framework with two destination states: inactivity and employment. The innovation is the recognition of defective risks. A polynomial hazard function is used to differentiate between two possible sources of infinite durations. The first is produced by a random process of unlucky draws, the second by workers rejecting a destination state. The evidence favors the mover-stayer model over the search model. Refinement of the former approach, using a more flexible baseline hazard function, produces a robust and more convincing explanation for positive and zero transition rates out of unemployment.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 156-191 |
| Number of pages | 36 |
| Journal | The Journal of Human Resources |
| Volume | 38(1) |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2003 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Management of Technology and Innovation
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Strategy and Management
- Economics and Econometrics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Unemployment Duration: Competing and Defective Risks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver