(Un)reasonable beliefs: How rape myth beliefs impact (mock) juror decision-making in Northern Ireland and how potential bias might be lessened

The 2018 ‘Ulster Rugby Rape Trial’ emphasised concerns regarding potential prejudicial impact of rape myths on jurors. Innovative mock juror research with members of the Northern Irish public found significant levels of rape myth beliefs which swayed participants against the complainant, while men, who were more likely to demonstrate such beliefs in their reasoning, were more inclined to acquit the defendant. The Gillen review recommends pre-trial juror training, but this may have limited effect without a much wider long-term youth and public education campaign to eradicate the patriarchal cultural stereotyping which supports rape mythology. A re-examination of rape law and trial process should also be considered.