Urban governance and economic development. A critique of Merseyside and objective I status

Philip Boland*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In recent years there has been an accelerating academic interest in the coherence of European regional policy, particularly in relation to the local application of Structural Funds. In tandem there has also been an increasing importance attached to the governance of regions and localities. This article fuses these two sets of debates in critically examining European Objective I support for Merseyside in the UK. Merseyside was an Objective I region for the 1994-1999 programming period, and this article traces some of the fundamental fault lines in the design and delivery of its Single Programming Document - the strategy and resource framework accompanying Structural Funding. It therefore provides some instructive lessons for the 2000-2006 UK-based Objective I regions: Merseyside (receiving its second tranche of support) and the new recipients of Cornwall and Scilly, South Yorkshire, and West Wales and the Valleys.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)211-222
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean Urban and Regional Studies
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Jan 2000
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Urban Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Urban governance and economic development. A critique of Merseyside and objective I status'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this