Using Comparative Constitutionalism in Human Rights Discourse: Ireland’s Past and Scotland’s Future

Christopher McCrudden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The article considers the use of comparisons in constitutional development, specifically the use of comparative reasoning in the context of debates about human rights in newly emerging independent states, using the examples of Ireland and Scotland.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)314-342
Number of pages28
JournalEdinburgh Law Review
Volume17
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Keywords

  • Scotland, Ireland, comparative constitutional development, human rights, independence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Using Comparative Constitutionalism in Human Rights Discourse: Ireland’s Past and Scotland’s Future'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this