Variability inworking memory performance explained by epistasis vs polygenic scores in the ZNF804A pathway

Kristin K. Nicodemus*, April Hargreaves, Derek Morris, Richard Anney, Michael Gill, Aiden Corvin, Gary Donohoe, S. Ripke, K. S. Kendler, D. F. Levinson, P. Sklar, P. A. Holmans, D. Y. Lin, R. A. Ophoff, O. A. Andreassen, E. Scolnick, S. Cichon, D. St Clair, H. Gurling, T. WergeD. Rujescu, D. H. Blackwood, C. N. Pato, S. Purcell, F. Dudbridge, B. M. Neale, L. Rossin, P. M. Visscher, D. Posthuma, D. M. Ruderfer, A. Fanous, H. Stefansson, S. Steinberg, B. J. Mowry, V. Golimbet, M. De Hert, E. G. Jönsson, I. Bitter, O. P. Pietiläinen, D. A. Collier, S. Tosato, I. Agartz, M. Albus, R. L. Amdur, F. Amin, N. Bass, S. E. Bergen, F. O'Neill, A. D. Børglum, R. Bruggeman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)


IMPORTANCE We investigated the variation in neuropsychological function explained by risk alleles at the psychosis susceptibility gene ZNF804A and its interacting partners using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), polygenic scores, and epistatic analyses. Of particular importance was the relative contribution of the polygenic score vs epistasis in variation explained. OBJECTIVES To (1) assess the association between SNPs in ZNF804A and the ZNF804A polygenic score with measures of cognition in cases with psychosis and (2) assess whether epistasis within the ZNF804A pathway could explain additional variation above and beyond that explained by the polygenic score. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Patients with psychosis (n = 424)were assessed in areas of cognitive ability impaired in schizophrenia including IQ, memory, attention, and social cognition.We used the Psychiatric GWAS Consortium 1 schizophrenia genome-wide association study to calculate a polygenic score based on identified risk variants within this genetic pathway. Cognitive measures significantly associated with the polygenic score were tested for an epistatic component using a training set (n = 170), which was used to develop linear regression models containing the polygenic score and 2-SNP interactions. The best-fitting models were tested for replication in 2 independent test sets of cases: (1) 170 individuals with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and (2) 84 patients with broad psychosis (including bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and other psychosis). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Participants completed a neuropsychological assessment battery designed to target the cognitive deficits of schizophrenia including general cognitive function, episodic memory, working memory, attentional control, and social cognition. RESULTS Higher polygenic scores were associated with poorer performance among patients on IQ, memory, and social cognition, explaining 1%to 3%of variation on these scores (range, P = .01 to .03). Using a narrow psychosis training set and independent test sets of narrow phenotype psychosis (schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder), broad psychosis, and control participants (n = 89), the addition of 2 interaction terms containing 2 SNPs each increased the R2 for spatial working memory strategy in the independent psychosis test sets from 1.2%using the polygenic score only to 4.8%(P = .11 and .001, respectively) but did not explain additional variation in control participants. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These data support a role for the ZNF804A pathway in IQ, memory, and social cognition in cases. Furthermore, we showed that epistasis increases the variation explained above the contribution of the polygenic score.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)778-785
Number of pages8
JournalJAMA Psychiatry
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - 01 Jul 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health


Dive into the research topics of 'Variability inworking memory performance explained by epistasis vs polygenic scores in the ZNF804A pathway'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this