We need timely access to mental health data: implications of the Goldacre review

Duncan E Astle; Anna Moore; Louise Marryat; Essi Viding; Karen L Mansfield; Mina Fazel; Matthias Pierce; Kathryn M Abel; Jonathan Green; Ann John; Matthew R Broome; Rachel Upthegrove; Helen Bould; Helen Minnis; Ruchika Gajwani; Madeleine J Groom; Chris Hollis; Elizabeth Liddle; Kapil Sayal; Vashti Berry; Stephan Collishaw; Helen Dawes; Samuele Cortese; Mara Violato; Jack Pollard; James H MacCabe; Sarah-Jayne Blakemore; Emily Simonoff; Edward Watkins; Rachel M Hiller; Ellen Townsend; Cherie Armour; John R Geddes; Lucy Thompson; Matthias Schwannauer; Dasha Nicholls; Matthew Hotopf; Johnny Downs; Atif Rahman; Aditya Narain Sharma; Tamsin J Ford

doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00030-5

We need timely access to mental health data: implications of the Goldacre review

Duncan E Astle^*, Anna Moore, Louise Marryat, Essi Viding, Karen L Mansfield, Mina Fazel, Matthias Pierce, Kathryn M Abel, Jonathan Green, Ann John, Matthew R Broome, Rachel Upthegrove, Helen Bould, Helen Minnis, Ruchika Gajwani, Madeleine J Groom, Chris Hollis, Elizabeth Liddle, Kapil Sayal, Vashti BerryStephan Collishaw, Helen Dawes, Samuele Cortese, Mara Violato, Jack Pollard, James H MacCabe, Sarah-Jayne Blakemore, Emily Simonoff, Edward Watkins, Rachel M Hiller, Ellen Townsend, Cherie Armour, John R Geddes, Lucy Thompson, Matthias Schwannauer, Dasha Nicholls, Matthew Hotopf, Johnny Downs, Atif Rahman, Aditya Narain Sharma, Tamsin J Ford

^*Corresponding author for this work

School of Psychology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Goldacre review, published in April, 2022, is a landmark evaluation of the use, availability, and safety of National Health Service (NHS) data across all four nations of the UK. The review underscores the necessary role of data in driving health-care improvement and innovation, and the potential risks inherent in using data routinely contributed by health service users. The review recommends a radical overhaul in NHS data curation, access, and analysis, and, crucially, argues that substantial new resources must be marshalled to make this aspiration a reality.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	242-244
Number of pages	3
Journal	The Lancet Psychiatry
Volume	10
Issue number	4
Early online date	15 Mar 2023
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00030-5
Publication status	Published - Apr 2023

Keywords

Mental Health
Health Services Accessibility
Mental Health Services
Humans

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00030-5Licence: Unspecified

Cite this

Astle, D. E., Moore, A., Marryat, L., Viding, E., Mansfield, K. L., Fazel, M., Pierce, M., Abel, K. M., Green, J., John, A., Broome, M. R., Upthegrove, R., Bould, H., Minnis, H., Gajwani, R., Groom, M. J., Hollis, C., Liddle, E., Sayal, K., ... Ford, T. J. (2023). We need timely access to mental health data: implications of the Goldacre review. The Lancet Psychiatry, 10(4), 242-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00030-5

@article{b336a734c1a448f889b7a7af3cab3416,

title = "We need timely access to mental health data: implications of the Goldacre review",

abstract = "The Goldacre review, published in April, 2022, is a landmark evaluation of the use, availability, and safety of National Health Service (NHS) data across all four nations of the UK. The review underscores the necessary role of data in driving health-care improvement and innovation, and the potential risks inherent in using data routinely contributed by health service users. The review recommends a radical overhaul in NHS data curation, access, and analysis, and, crucially, argues that substantial new resources must be marshalled to make this aspiration a reality.",

keywords = "Mental Health, Health Services Accessibility, Mental Health Services, Humans",

author = "Astle, {Duncan E} and Anna Moore and Louise Marryat and Essi Viding and Mansfield, {Karen L} and Mina Fazel and Matthias Pierce and Abel, {Kathryn M} and Jonathan Green and Ann John and Broome, {Matthew R} and Rachel Upthegrove and Helen Bould and Helen Minnis and Ruchika Gajwani and Groom, {Madeleine J} and Chris Hollis and Elizabeth Liddle and Kapil Sayal and Vashti Berry and Stephan Collishaw and Helen Dawes and Samuele Cortese and Mara Violato and Jack Pollard and MacCabe, {James H} and Sarah-Jayne Blakemore and Emily Simonoff and Edward Watkins and Hiller, {Rachel M} and Ellen Townsend and Cherie Armour and Geddes, {John R} and Lucy Thompson and Matthias Schwannauer and Dasha Nicholls and Matthew Hotopf and Johnny Downs and Atif Rahman and Sharma, {Aditya Narain} and Ford, {Tamsin J}",

year = "2023",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00030-5",

language = "English",

volume = "10",

pages = "242--244",

journal = "The Lancet Psychiatry",

issn = "2215-0374",

publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

number = "4",

}

Astle, DE, Moore, A, Marryat, L, Viding, E, Mansfield, KL, Fazel, M, Pierce, M, Abel, KM, Green, J, John, A, Broome, MR, Upthegrove, R, Bould, H, Minnis, H, Gajwani, R, Groom, MJ, Hollis, C, Liddle, E, Sayal, K, Berry, V, Collishaw, S, Dawes, H, Cortese, S, Violato, M, Pollard, J, MacCabe, JH, Blakemore, S-J, Simonoff, E, Watkins, E, Hiller, RM, Townsend, E, Armour, C, Geddes, JR, Thompson, L, Schwannauer, M, Nicholls, D, Hotopf, M, Downs, J, Rahman, A, Sharma, AN & Ford, TJ 2023, 'We need timely access to mental health data: implications of the Goldacre review', The Lancet Psychiatry, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 242-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00030-5

TY - JOUR

T1 - We need timely access to mental health data: implications of the Goldacre review

AU - Astle, Duncan E

AU - Moore, Anna

AU - Marryat, Louise

AU - Viding, Essi

AU - Mansfield, Karen L

AU - Fazel, Mina

AU - Pierce, Matthias

AU - Abel, Kathryn M

AU - Green, Jonathan

AU - John, Ann

AU - Broome, Matthew R

AU - Upthegrove, Rachel

AU - Bould, Helen

AU - Minnis, Helen

AU - Gajwani, Ruchika

AU - Groom, Madeleine J

AU - Hollis, Chris

AU - Liddle, Elizabeth

AU - Sayal, Kapil

AU - Berry, Vashti

AU - Collishaw, Stephan

AU - Dawes, Helen

AU - Cortese, Samuele

AU - Violato, Mara

AU - Pollard, Jack

AU - MacCabe, James H

AU - Blakemore, Sarah-Jayne

AU - Simonoff, Emily

AU - Watkins, Edward

AU - Hiller, Rachel M

AU - Townsend, Ellen

AU - Armour, Cherie

AU - Geddes, John R

AU - Thompson, Lucy

AU - Schwannauer, Matthias

AU - Nicholls, Dasha

AU - Hotopf, Matthew

AU - Downs, Johnny

AU - Rahman, Atif

AU - Sharma, Aditya Narain

AU - Ford, Tamsin J

PY - 2023/4

Y1 - 2023/4

N2 - The Goldacre review, published in April, 2022, is a landmark evaluation of the use, availability, and safety of National Health Service (NHS) data across all four nations of the UK. The review underscores the necessary role of data in driving health-care improvement and innovation, and the potential risks inherent in using data routinely contributed by health service users. The review recommends a radical overhaul in NHS data curation, access, and analysis, and, crucially, argues that substantial new resources must be marshalled to make this aspiration a reality.

AB - The Goldacre review, published in April, 2022, is a landmark evaluation of the use, availability, and safety of National Health Service (NHS) data across all four nations of the UK. The review underscores the necessary role of data in driving health-care improvement and innovation, and the potential risks inherent in using data routinely contributed by health service users. The review recommends a radical overhaul in NHS data curation, access, and analysis, and, crucially, argues that substantial new resources must be marshalled to make this aspiration a reality.

KW - Mental Health

KW - Health Services Accessibility

KW - Mental Health Services

KW - Humans

U2 - 10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00030-5

DO - 10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00030-5

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 36931773

SN - 2215-0374

VL - 10

SP - 242

EP - 244

JO - The Lancet Psychiatry

JF - The Lancet Psychiatry

IS - 4

ER -

We need timely access to mental health data: implications of the Goldacre review

Abstract

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this