What Did the Lawyers Do During the 'War' ? Neutrality, Conflict and the Culture of Quietism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)
173 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Using Northern Ireland as a case study, this paper explores how lawyers responded to the challenges of entrenched discrimination, sustained political violence and an emerging peace process. Drawing upon the literature of the sociology of lawyering, it examines whether lawyers can or should be more than ‘paid technicians’ in such circumstances. It focuses in particular upon a number of ‘critical junctures’ in the legal history of the jurisdiction and uncouples key elements of the local legal culture which contributed to an ethos of quietism. The paper argues that the version of legal professionalism that emerged in Northern Ireland was contingent and socially constructed and, with notable exceptions, obfuscated a collective failure of moral courage. It concludes that facing the truth concerning past silence is fundamental to a properly embedded rule of law and a more grounded notion of what it means to be a lawyer in a conflict.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)350-384
Number of pages35
JournalThe Modern Law Review
Volume74
Issue number3
Early online date03 May 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2011

Fingerprint

neutrality
lawyer
peace process
political violence
technician
constitutional state
jurisdiction
sociology
discrimination
history

Cite this

@article{20159c9f10ba4d5da75f2279cdf56bf8,
title = "What Did the Lawyers Do During the 'War' ? Neutrality, Conflict and the Culture of Quietism",
abstract = "Using Northern Ireland as a case study, this paper explores how lawyers responded to the challenges of entrenched discrimination, sustained political violence and an emerging peace process. Drawing upon the literature of the sociology of lawyering, it examines whether lawyers can or should be more than ‘paid technicians’ in such circumstances. It focuses in particular upon a number of ‘critical junctures’ in the legal history of the jurisdiction and uncouples key elements of the local legal culture which contributed to an ethos of quietism. The paper argues that the version of legal professionalism that emerged in Northern Ireland was contingent and socially constructed and, with notable exceptions, obfuscated a collective failure of moral courage. It concludes that facing the truth concerning past silence is fundamental to a properly embedded rule of law and a more grounded notion of what it means to be a lawyer in a conflict.",
author = "Kieran McEvoy",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2230.2011.00851.x",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
pages = "350--384",
journal = "Modern Law Review",
issn = "0026-7961",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

What Did the Lawyers Do During the 'War' ? Neutrality, Conflict and the Culture of Quietism. / McEvoy, Kieran.

In: The Modern Law Review , Vol. 74 , No. 3, 05.2011, p. 350-384.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - What Did the Lawyers Do During the 'War' ? Neutrality, Conflict and the Culture of Quietism

AU - McEvoy, Kieran

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - Using Northern Ireland as a case study, this paper explores how lawyers responded to the challenges of entrenched discrimination, sustained political violence and an emerging peace process. Drawing upon the literature of the sociology of lawyering, it examines whether lawyers can or should be more than ‘paid technicians’ in such circumstances. It focuses in particular upon a number of ‘critical junctures’ in the legal history of the jurisdiction and uncouples key elements of the local legal culture which contributed to an ethos of quietism. The paper argues that the version of legal professionalism that emerged in Northern Ireland was contingent and socially constructed and, with notable exceptions, obfuscated a collective failure of moral courage. It concludes that facing the truth concerning past silence is fundamental to a properly embedded rule of law and a more grounded notion of what it means to be a lawyer in a conflict.

AB - Using Northern Ireland as a case study, this paper explores how lawyers responded to the challenges of entrenched discrimination, sustained political violence and an emerging peace process. Drawing upon the literature of the sociology of lawyering, it examines whether lawyers can or should be more than ‘paid technicians’ in such circumstances. It focuses in particular upon a number of ‘critical junctures’ in the legal history of the jurisdiction and uncouples key elements of the local legal culture which contributed to an ethos of quietism. The paper argues that the version of legal professionalism that emerged in Northern Ireland was contingent and socially constructed and, with notable exceptions, obfuscated a collective failure of moral courage. It concludes that facing the truth concerning past silence is fundamental to a properly embedded rule of law and a more grounded notion of what it means to be a lawyer in a conflict.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2011.00851.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2011.00851.x

M3 - Article

VL - 74

SP - 350

EP - 384

JO - Modern Law Review

JF - Modern Law Review

SN - 0026-7961

IS - 3

ER -