When all you have is a hammer ...: RCTs and hegemony in science

Mickey Keenan, Karola Dillenburger

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    24 Citations (Scopus)
    38 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    People diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) deserve the same respect as any other person and should be free to benefit from scientific research that can help them achieve skills which enable them to reach their full potential. Over the past 40 years Applied Behaviour Analysis (ABA) has utilised inductive, natural science methods to investigate techniques for the analysis and augmentation of socially significant behaviours. Unfortunately, many individuals with ASD in the UK cannot avail of these techniques because of an obdurate reliance on randomised controlled trials (RCTs) as the single most respectable measure of effectiveness of interventions. In this paper we focus on how the debate about RCTs is played out in the ‘autism wars’.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-13
    Number of pages13
    JournalResearch on Autism Spectrum Disorder
    Volume5
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2011

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Psychiatry and Mental health
    • Clinical Psychology
    • Developmental and Educational Psychology

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'When all you have is a hammer ...: RCTs and hegemony in science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this