Who is susceptible to conjunction fallacies in category-based induction?

Aidan Feeney, P. Shafto, D. Dunning

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)


Recent evidence suggests that the conjunction fallacy observed in people's probabilistic reasoning is also to be found in their evaluations of inductive argument strength. We presented 130 participants with materials likely to produce a conjunction fallacy either by virtue of a shared categorical or a causal relationship between the categories in the argument. We also took a measure of participants' cognitive ability. We observed conjunction fallacies overall with both sets of materials but found an association with ability for the categorical materials only. Our results have implications for accounts of individual differences in reasoning, for the relevance theory of induction, and for the recent claim that causal knowledge is important in inductive reasoning.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)884-889
Number of pages6
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2007

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Psychology (miscellaneous)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Who is susceptible to conjunction fallacies in category-based induction?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this