Why Northern Ireland’s Institutions Need Stability

Christopher McCrudden, John McGarry , Brendan O'Leary, Alex Schwartz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)
1682 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Northern Ireland’s consociational institutions were reviewed by a committee of its Assembly in 2012–13. The arguments of both critics and exponents of the arrangements are of general interest to scholars of comparative politics, powersharing and constitutional design. The authors of this article review the debates and evidence on the d’Hondt rule of executive formation, political designation, the likely impact of changing district magnitudes for assembly elections, and existing patterns of opposition and accountability. They evaluate the scholarly, political and legal literature before commending the merits of maintaining the existing system, including the rules under which the system might be modified in future.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)30-58
Number of pages29
JournalGovernment and Opposition
Volume51
Issue number1
Early online date11 Aug 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2016

Keywords

  • Northern Ireland, consociationism, voting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why Northern Ireland’s Institutions Need Stability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this