Why Northern Ireland’s Institutions Need Stability

Christopher McCrudden, John McGarry , Brendan O'Leary, Alex Schwartz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)
1993 Downloads (Pure)


Northern Ireland’s consociational institutions were reviewed by a committee of its Assembly in 2012–13. The arguments of both critics and exponents of the arrangements are of general interest to scholars of comparative politics, powersharing and constitutional design. The authors of this article review the debates and evidence on the d’Hondt rule of executive formation, political designation, the likely impact of changing district magnitudes for assembly elections, and existing patterns of opposition and accountability. They evaluate the scholarly, political and legal literature before commending the merits of maintaining the existing system, including the rules under which the system might be modified in future.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)30-58
Number of pages29
JournalGovernment and Opposition
Issue number1
Early online date11 Aug 2014
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2016


  • Northern Ireland, consociationism, voting


Dive into the research topics of 'Why Northern Ireland’s Institutions Need Stability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this