Abstract
It is widely believed that work-related training increases a worker’s probability of moving up the job-quality ladder. This is usually couched in terms of effects on wages, but it has also been argued that training increases the probability of moving from non-permanent forms of employment to more permanent employment. This hypothesis is tested using nationally representative panel data for Australia, a country where the incidence of non-permanent employment, and especially casual employment, is high by international standards. While a positive association between participation in work-related training and the subsequent probability of moving from either casual or fixed-term contract employment to permanent employment is observed among men, this is shown to be driven not by a causal impact of training on transitions but by differences between those who do and do not receive training; i.e., selection bias.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 623-646 |
| Journal | British Journal of Industrial Relations |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 05 Apr 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2016 |
Keywords
- casual employment; work-related training; non-permanent employment; contingent employment; HILDA Survey
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Work-related training and the probability of transitioning from non-permanent to permanent employment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver