Judging the Singular: Towards a Contingent Practice of Improvisation in Law

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle


    View graph of relations

    At present improvisation appears to be a tacit practice within law; regularly used but largely unacknowledged amongst legal practitioners. This article advances the benefits of improvisation and calls for a more conscious and critical practice of improvisation in law. However, in this process of moving from the tacit to the critical it is imperative to avoid an abstract practice of improvisation, as has often been advanced in recent musical improvisation literature. The way in which we propose this can be avoided is by foregrounding contingency. This discussion urging towards a contingent practice of improvisation in law will focus on the role of the judge and judicial improvisation.



    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages9
    JournalCritical Studies in Improvisation
    Journal publication date03 Apr 2018
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 03 Apr 2018

      Research areas

    • Improvisation, Law, Music

    ID: 137829180