Mathematics anxiety and metacognitive processes: Proposal for a new line of inquiry

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Published

    View graph of relations

    This paper presents a proposal for a new area of investigation that connects the metacognition literature, and especially the recently developed meta-reasoning framework, with research into mathematical reasoning, mathematics learning, and mathematics anxiety. Whereas the literature on mathematics anxiety focusses on the end result of learning and problem-solving, the metacognitive approach can offer further insight by a fine-grained analysis of the stages of these processes. In particular, it provides tools for exposing students' initial assessment of tasks and test situations, the targets they set for themselves, the process of monitoring progress, and decisions to stick with or abandon a particular solution. The paper outlines various ways in which the metacognitive approach could be used to investigate the effects of mathematics anxiety on mathematics learning and problem solving. This approach could help in answering questions like: Do anxious and non-anxious learners differ in how they prepare for an exam? Are anxious students more or less prone to overconfidence than non-anxious students? What metacognitive decisions mediate maths anxious participants' tendency to give up on problems too early? Additionally, this line of work has the potential to significantly expand the scope of metacognitive investigations and provide novel insights into individual differences in the metacognitive regulation of learning and problem solving. It could also offer some practical benefits by focusing the attention of educational designers on particular components within the learning process of anxious students.

    Documents

    • Mathematics Anxiety and Metacognitive Processes: Proposal for a New Line of Inquiry

      Rights statement: © 2019 The Authors. This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution- ShareAlike License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the author and source are cited, and new contributions are distributed under the same license.

      Final published version, 1 MB, PDF-document

    DOI

    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages23
    Pages (from-to)147-169
    JournalPsychological Topics
    Journal publication date2019
    Issue number1
    Volume28
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2019

    ID: 169204522