The Right to Family Reunion vs Integration Requirements for Third-Country Nationals. The CJEU’s Approach and the Road Not Taken

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Published

    View graph of relations

    Abstract The article explores the approach of the Court of Justice of the European Union to the clash between the fundamental right to family reunion and the powers of Member States to protect national identity as a manifestation of sovereignty. The recent caselaw pertinent to national measures imposing pre-entry, integration conditions on foreigners and the latter rights under the Directive 2006/83/EC (‘FRD’) on the right of third-country nationals to family reunion provides a basis for the analysis. The aim of this article is to establish and appraise the Court’s approach to the conflict in question. My claim is that the CJEU should have been more restrictive in its reasoning regarding the pre-entry integration measures, and that its interpretation based on individual assessment, proportionality principle and effet utile may not be sufficient for a scrutiny of national powers under FRD. I thus argue that the Court should be more proactive to provide a constitutional, contextual and systemic interpretation of the right to family reunion under the FRD, Article 7 and 24 of the EU Charter and the EU migration law system.

    Documents

    • The Right to Family Reunion vs Integration Requirements for Third-Country Nationals. The CJEU’s Approach and the Road Not Taken

      Rights statement: Copyright 2018 Brill Academic Publishers. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

      Accepted author manuscript, 270 KB, PDF-document

      Embargo ends: 12/09/2020

    DOI

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalEuropean Journal of Migration and Law
    Journal publication date12 Sep 2018
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 12 Sep 2018

    ID: 167171332